French cinema houses some twisted individuals. Sure
they produce lots of dialogue-driven dramas, but on the other end of
the spectrum are people like Grandrieux (La Vie Nouvelle)
and Noé (Irréversible) ripping all cinematic standards to shreds. They
are loud, in your face and direct, granting their work an impact many
directors could only dream about. Sit back and let yourself be swept
away be Noé's latest epic masterpiece, a dazzling trip to the neon-lit
street of Tokyo.
Noé really took his time for this film. It's been 8 years since Irréversible and even though he did a few shorts for anthology projects in between (8, Destricted) his fans were longing for a new full-length feature. As a pretty big fan myself I've been trying to avoid most of the teasers and trailers to go in as fresh as possible. The poster art was reason enough to believe everything was going to turn out just fine. The only thing that worried me a little was the 160 minute runtime, a serious gamble for a director who's known for his experimental approach to cinema.
The film is split into three main parts. The first part is filmed entirely from the POV of the main character. It consists of several long takes, following Oscar (our main guy) approaching his inevitable demise. From there on, the film switches to a series of flashbacks, mostly filmed from right behind Oscar's head and providing all the needed background story. The final part returns to Oscar, floating in limbo, zooming in and out of scenes after his death.
More than a change in camera motions, the three parts each have their own unique pacing. The first part is laid-back and chill, the second part is swift and stitched together from very short scenes, while the final part has a more spiraling, repeating structure. Much like Irréversible this might alienate a part of the audience expecting the same bang found at the start of the film the whole way through.
As for the visuals, this film is quite simply insane. From the constant neon-happy surroundings to the frequent strobes, the color palette alone is a complete visual assault. The camera work is quite possibly even more impressive. Noé forces his camera in the most improbable arcs and comes up with insane pathways, busting through houses and floating across streets to reach his next destination. A truly stunning tour de force that goes beyond mere visual trickery and really finds its way into the core experience of the film.
The soundtrack is equally powerful. Starting a film with LFO - Freak is always good for a few extra points (though not all that original - Hard Candy used that song before), but the meticulous sound design of Bangalter and his crew is a driving force behind the success of this film. Superb ambient sounds create a haunting yet beautiful flow on which the films spirals deeper and deeper, merging into a trip of its own.
Once again Noé asks a lot of his actors, though they never seem to reach the heights of Cassel and Bellucci. Still, they deliver more than enough to make the film work on a dramatic level. Their characters might not be the easiest ones to identify with and acting with a camera continuously fixed to the back of your head might not be the easiest way to make a character come to life, but by the end of the film the main characters feel familiar enough for the audience to have sufficiently bonded with them.
The main problem with Enter The Void is its third act. Some people will endure the repeating structure and will be taken to the next step of the trip, others will break down and will end the film in a somewhat numbed-down state of mind. It's the price you pay when making a lengthy film like this (think Bullet Ballet or Miike's Izo). Many people have suggested the film could've been a lot shorter and if you're purely interested in the facts of the background story then this is definitely the case.
All these scenes are crucial to the experience of the last act though and safe a few short bits I didn't feel as if anything could be cut from the film. I must say that Enter The Void seemed a lot longer than it actually lasted (I felt like I'd been watching for at least 4 hours) but since it was such a thoroughly immersive trip I didn't mind at all.
Overall the film is still quite downbeat, though it does lack a little of the fatalist and depressing atmosphere of Noé's earlier works. His style is still very much in your face and subtlety is not something high on his priority list, but the overall feeling is a lot more relaxed and it feels way more like a long-winding trip to a completely alien universe rather than a whiplash. That's not to say the film doesn't deal a fair few blows during its entire running time.
Add some very obvious 2001 references, lots of hooks for personal interpretation and a long list of impressive crew credits (Benoit Debie, Marc Caro, Thomas Bangalter, Lucile Hadzihalilovic) and you have all the ingredients for a landmark production. Whether you will fully appreciate Noé's film depends on your stamina and whether you appreciate his direct approach, but on a cinematic level alone there is plenty to enjoy here. For me, definitely the best film I've seen this year, a more immersive experience than Irréversible and already one of my favorite films ever. Recommended, just make sure you're parents aren't around when watching it.
Noé really took his time for this film. It's been 8 years since Irréversible and even though he did a few shorts for anthology projects in between (8, Destricted) his fans were longing for a new full-length feature. As a pretty big fan myself I've been trying to avoid most of the teasers and trailers to go in as fresh as possible. The poster art was reason enough to believe everything was going to turn out just fine. The only thing that worried me a little was the 160 minute runtime, a serious gamble for a director who's known for his experimental approach to cinema.
The film is split into three main parts. The first part is filmed entirely from the POV of the main character. It consists of several long takes, following Oscar (our main guy) approaching his inevitable demise. From there on, the film switches to a series of flashbacks, mostly filmed from right behind Oscar's head and providing all the needed background story. The final part returns to Oscar, floating in limbo, zooming in and out of scenes after his death.
More than a change in camera motions, the three parts each have their own unique pacing. The first part is laid-back and chill, the second part is swift and stitched together from very short scenes, while the final part has a more spiraling, repeating structure. Much like Irréversible this might alienate a part of the audience expecting the same bang found at the start of the film the whole way through.
As for the visuals, this film is quite simply insane. From the constant neon-happy surroundings to the frequent strobes, the color palette alone is a complete visual assault. The camera work is quite possibly even more impressive. Noé forces his camera in the most improbable arcs and comes up with insane pathways, busting through houses and floating across streets to reach his next destination. A truly stunning tour de force that goes beyond mere visual trickery and really finds its way into the core experience of the film.
The soundtrack is equally powerful. Starting a film with LFO - Freak is always good for a few extra points (though not all that original - Hard Candy used that song before), but the meticulous sound design of Bangalter and his crew is a driving force behind the success of this film. Superb ambient sounds create a haunting yet beautiful flow on which the films spirals deeper and deeper, merging into a trip of its own.
Once again Noé asks a lot of his actors, though they never seem to reach the heights of Cassel and Bellucci. Still, they deliver more than enough to make the film work on a dramatic level. Their characters might not be the easiest ones to identify with and acting with a camera continuously fixed to the back of your head might not be the easiest way to make a character come to life, but by the end of the film the main characters feel familiar enough for the audience to have sufficiently bonded with them.
The main problem with Enter The Void is its third act. Some people will endure the repeating structure and will be taken to the next step of the trip, others will break down and will end the film in a somewhat numbed-down state of mind. It's the price you pay when making a lengthy film like this (think Bullet Ballet or Miike's Izo). Many people have suggested the film could've been a lot shorter and if you're purely interested in the facts of the background story then this is definitely the case.
All these scenes are crucial to the experience of the last act though and safe a few short bits I didn't feel as if anything could be cut from the film. I must say that Enter The Void seemed a lot longer than it actually lasted (I felt like I'd been watching for at least 4 hours) but since it was such a thoroughly immersive trip I didn't mind at all.
Overall the film is still quite downbeat, though it does lack a little of the fatalist and depressing atmosphere of Noé's earlier works. His style is still very much in your face and subtlety is not something high on his priority list, but the overall feeling is a lot more relaxed and it feels way more like a long-winding trip to a completely alien universe rather than a whiplash. That's not to say the film doesn't deal a fair few blows during its entire running time.
Add some very obvious 2001 references, lots of hooks for personal interpretation and a long list of impressive crew credits (Benoit Debie, Marc Caro, Thomas Bangalter, Lucile Hadzihalilovic) and you have all the ingredients for a landmark production. Whether you will fully appreciate Noé's film depends on your stamina and whether you appreciate his direct approach, but on a cinematic level alone there is plenty to enjoy here. For me, definitely the best film I've seen this year, a more immersive experience than Irréversible and already one of my favorite films ever. Recommended, just make sure you're parents aren't around when watching it.
More from Enter the Void
- News: Hey Toronto! Spend New Years Melting Your Brain With Gaspar Noe's ENTER THE VOID!
- Reviews: ENTER THE VOID Review
- News: North American Trailer for Gaspar Noe's ENTER THE VOID
- News: French Theatrical Trailer For Gaspar Noe's ENTER THE VOID
- Interviews: HKIFF 2010: GASPAR NOE talks ENTER THE VOID
- Reviews: SXSW 2010: ENTER THE VOID Review
- Reviews: HKIFF 2010: ENTER THE VOID Review
- Reviews: TIFF 09: ENTER THE VOID Review


You obviously haven't met my parents!
But in what way would you assume this film to be too explicit for them?
Have watched both DEAD ALIVE (Braindead) and Fruit Chan's DUMPLINGS with my folks. Not sure how they would respond to Enter To Void.
Either way, I look forward to checking this out on the big screen again when it opens at Lightbox at the End of the Month for a limited run. If you are in Toronto, do NOT miss this rare chance to see this film on the big screen!
Sorry guys, but I personally thought this flick was garbage. The first 40 minutes are absolutely brilliant and lovely and awesome and... well, there are no words. But the movie runs for 3 hours, most of which is the camera floating around way too slowly from one end of Tokyo to the next, or replays of earlier scenes in the movie shot at different angles than the first. Major snore material. A good hour and a half needs to be hacked off this POS, and then maybe you'd have a masterpiece.
But don't just take my word for it.
Major Rager - I watched this on my big screen HD system at home, and the friend I watched it with also found the first half was great, but then for her, the film also got very boring and snore-worthy.
Not I!
I loved every minute of it, and thought every minute was exactly as it should be. The contemplation going on passed through, then back into, me - and I truly became personally involved, to the point where I was contemplating what I perceived the main character to be contemplating.
Whether Noe had any intention for that kind of crossover or not, it worked for me - substance free!
What you and my pal saw as a 'snore factor', I saw as essential - probably because it really enveloped me!.
I could go on, but this is the kind of film I'm so grateful to have seen, I wax far too lyrical, to the point of seeming like the dickiest pretentious twat around - so, I'll leave it at that!
*sigh* I loved this film, but the cinema audience I saw it with sure didn't. Partly it was the fault of the cinema - too-small screen, badly projected, lights still up during start of the opening credits (anyone that has seen it can imagine what an affront that is to those glorious crazy credits!), and then they started bringing up the lights and closing the curtains at the end before it finished too. Oh and it sounded like the sound was solely coming from two front speakers, and was low enough to be difficult to make out what was being said sometimes.
But the worst thing was the audience who laughed inappropriately through almost the whole thing...including, I kid you not, during the ***SPOILERS***
abortion scene. Not only while Linda was HAVING the abortion, but also when the camera descended to take a close-up of the ruined fetus. Hilarity! Yuck it up, assholes. I understand nervous laughter, but man
also, we got the cut version of the flick, blah. 140 mins or so rather than 160. But I should be glad; I can't imagine the laughter and jeering and mocking applause that would've accompanied the full thing. At one point my friend with me said "can you shut up, some of us wanna watch the movie." - about one person seemed to agree with her, someone else called out "WHAT movie?" and 99% of he cinema laughed.
I'm getting increasingly more interested in seeing good movies at home than at arthouse cinemas. I mean that shit wouldn't even happen (the screening issues) at a multiplex, why is it happening at one of Melbourne's premier arthouse cinemas?
I should point out however it was a preview screening and we did actually win tickets, so...perhaps I shouldn't complain, blah
Sorry, I guess that was a rant. Judging from IMDB, other screenings have had jackasses and laughter too, so I guess I'm not alone
But the film is also already one of my all-time favourites too
It's one hell of a poster though
It is indeed one hell of a poster. P.s. someone went through the opening credits and took a screencap of each one, you can see here. Pretty cool heh (hope it's okay to link to it): http://www.tigershungry.co.uk/2010/09/enter-the-void-opening-credits-as-stills/
Some of this stuff was funny. As mentioned above, the constant reminder of staying together sibling bonding was hit me over the head corny. The third act, in my opinion, was a lame telegraphed attempt at immersion. It got to the point where it became a gimmick and had me playing "Guess which item in this room the camera is going to hurl itself into, thus sparking the white out". *Spoilers* Oven flame! Random light fixture! Also wasn't a fan of constantly repeating important parts of the film. Loved the first act though. Shame it got so tedious.