It's frustrating following Feng Xiaogang's transformation into the Chinese Steven Spielberg. This isn't innately a bad thing. He's still a talented director capable of doing astonishing things with moving images. It's just a huge disappointment seeing Aftershock come so close to being something extraordinary only to waste far too much of its potential on saccharine melodrama and nationalist chest-beating, with a climax which feels completely unearned.
Based on the Chinese-language novel of the same name, Aftershock was released to tie in with the relief efforts following the Sichuan earthquake in 2008. The film tells the story of a family in Tangshan, beginning more than three decades earlier, when the great earthquake of 1976 devastated that city, killing nearly a quarter of a million people.
The family become separated in the chaos following the quake, when a dreadful misunderstanding sees the mother, Li Yuan Ni (Xu Fan, One Foot Off the Ground, A World Without Thieves) giving her daughter up for dead. Rescued by the army, the daughter, Fang Deng is adopted but remains haunted by memories of the disaster, while the son Fang Da - now crippled - struggles to balance what he wants out of life with his mother's expectations of him as her only surviving child.
Feng is clearly out to make a piece of matinee entertainment aimed first and foremost at mainland domestic viewers, and in many respects he succeeds admirably. By Hollywood standards the budget was minute (around $22m) and much of the production design funded by donation drives, but the money was largely well spent.
The introduction is a slick, polished bit of sun-drenched nostalgia, lulling the viewer with childhood horseplay and idealised scenes of family life in a bygone decade. The quake itself, while not up to the breadth and scope of contemporary disaster porn, is still a hugely impressive set piece. Parts of the CG are overly showy and somewhat rough around the edges, but much of the destruction is physical effects work which comes across as terrifyingly realistic.
And 2012 this is not. While it's doubtful anyone could get away with glamorising Tangshan in front of a mainland audience, Feng still deserves plaudits for making the aftermath look like hell on earth. While it's not especially explicit, the images of shell-shocked survivors stumbling blankly through the wreckage are harrowing stuff.
While Aftershock never again becomes quite so gut-wrenching, the conviction from everyone involved lends even the most melodramatic passages a great deal of power. The terrible choice that sets up the rest of the film is obviously contrived, but it never feels entirely implausible, and the cast sell much of the psychic fallout from it admirably.
Zhang Jingchu (Beast Stalker, Protege, Jade Warrior) looks a little too old to play the teenage Fang Deng, but other than that it's a joy to see her in something where she's not wasted (after the pitiful The Double Life). Chen Daoming (Hero, Infernal Affairs III) is also exceptional as her adoptive father, particularly as an old man. The veteran actor conveys a great deal with body language and wordless gestures without ever turning his character into a cartoon.
But the problem with Aftershock is Feng insists on playing to the crowd almost from start to finish. Again, the propaganda elements in many mainland films aren't necessarily wholly bad, but here they slowly drag the film down, cheapening what should be something genuinely compassionate and humanist through the sheer volume of treacly schmaltz.
It starts with the scenes immediately after the quake, where the score feels horribly inappropriate for something so raw, and Feng keeps piling on the big moments until they start to lose their impact. Fang Deng's new family squabbles are not especially convincing, her subplot at university is well-intended but feels like a pale echo of Li Shaohong's masterpiece Stolen Life and Xu Fan as her mother begins to dial her reactions a little too high as the film drags on.
And the way Feng ties the story into the Sichuan earthquake is about as ham-fisted a mis-step as might be feared. Every last beat of the epilogue is hammered home with a crushing lack of subtlety when only the most oblivious viewer would fail to see the parallels with the opening.
Aftershock is a marked improvement on the over-rated Assembly, and it does contain some absolutely enthralling moments of populist cinema. But it returns to the well for naked appeals to Chinese nationalist pride one too many times to feel like anything more than an exercise in flag-waving at the expense of credible character development or lasting emotive power, and can only be cautiously recommended.


Another example of how Chinese filmmakers respond to the film bureau's call for getting their message across perhaps? Makes you wonder how this extreme commercialization of the industry will influence Chinese filmmaking in the future.
Thoroughly accurate review, Eight Rooks, thank you. After the film's effective opening earthquake set piece, I kept presuming the film's title would promise more and was disappointed that the "aftershock" referred to the earthquake's psychological aftermath. Can I help it if I wanted a tsunami?
Perhaps what surprised me most was that--despite not having my hunger for disaster porn further satisfied--I still couldn't walk out on the film, still felt somehow engaged, even though its emotional melodramatics drove me to distraction.
I don't know. This film pretty much wasted me. I'm glad it wasn't a stupid disaster film. I don't know how this film plays for mainland viewers (I'm not one), but I didn't feel at all clubbed over the head with propaganda. Not even a little bit. Maybe you are too aware or suspicious. The film has some weaknesses. I think the narrative got a little jerky sometimes, but the story prevailed and the acting was all top-notch (except the white guy ... propaganda?). I also thought it was remarkable how restrained the obviously melodramatic moment of recognition at the end was played out.
Yep. I'm sure you know what I refer to as the "moment of recognition" while she was sitting there. Nothing happened at that moment, hell, the director just cut away, and then nothing happened melodramatically until the big bawling time at the cemetery. That's a big sequence and a long time about a big goddamn thing, and it played out like no big deal. That is the ultimate in restraint, in my book. I wanted to punch the film for being so kick-back about it.
And there's a difference between describing how a film does or doesn't relate to a book that inspired it, how you or anyone describes their view of nationalist Chinese propaganda psychology, etc ... and how a film simply affects you. Your review is educated and informative about a lot more than the movie was ... for me.
Aw, I think you're being a little mean to the film, disconnected a bit from the way an average film goer (not a film buff who's seen and critiqued thousands of films) might experience it. Nothing wrong with that. It's what educated film viewers do. I more or less accept most of your observations but think your overall conclusion might dissuade people from seeing a film I think most people will enjoy and be moved by.
What happened five minutes before the moment of recognition was one of Zhang's and the film's most powerful scenes. It wasn't melodramatic. And my 'nothing happened' remark deals with what happened from the moment of recognition until one of Zhang's and the film's weaker moments ... the crying scene in the cemetery. Everything in between, which in many ways is the conclusion of the film's story arc, was uneventful. Mom cried but Zhang was cold. It took her a long time to cry. She cries, the film ends.
You make it sound the 'coincidences', the sitting there and hearing them, are the kinds of things that only cheap scriptwriters come up with. It seems pretty acceptable storytelling to me. The whole point of the film wouldn't have been possible without Sichuan. It's the thing that brought Zhang's character around. Stories have been doing that forever. AFTERSHOCK might be "arguably blatant emotional manipulation, etc...." ARGUABLY. Like, if you want to ARGUE it. I don't think many people will experience it
ER, you've added a lot of great context to the film. I'm just hoping to provide some opposing balance because I highly recommend the film and think most people will enjoy this very moving film.