City Of God

THE EXPENDABLES Review

by Todd Brown, August 12, 2010 12:51 PM


The-Expendables-poster.jpg
[Tomorrow is the strongest release day of the year and so we are taking the opportunity to pull our reviews of the key new release titles back up to the top of the stack.]

Barney Ross has developed a conscience and it may be the death of him. Following your conscience leads to good things, if your mother is to be trusted, but Barney's world is a little different than most. He's a high risk, high powered mercenary, you see, the leader of a group known as The Expendables - soldiers of fortune who travel the world doing the jobs that nobody else is willing to do. And when Barney experiences a twinge of conscience the end result is not more open books or shopping fair trade, it's walking into a firefight in which his team is hugely outnumbered and outgunned, all for the sake of a girl.

The third picture to rise from Sylvester Stallone's late-period career comeback, The Expendables is probably the most anticipated of the lot. While Rambo and Rocky Balboa were deliberate bookends to the most iconic roles of his career, and films that read surprisingly well as post-modern commentaries on Stallone's own life and work, The Expendables finds Stallone tapping into the 80s action aesthetic that made him a huge star in the first place while also setting out to create an entirely new character, an entirely new franchise. And, yes, it works.

Let's be clear about a few things right up front. By many - if not most - critical standards, The Expendables is not a good film. If you're looking for character arcs, Oscar caliber performances, subtle writing and the like, you have come to the wrong place. Likewise, if you are expecting a comic parody of the period that produced Cobra and Commando, you've come to the wrong movie. If, however, what you want is a film that could easily have come from that era itself, then bingo! The Expendables is exactly the right ticket, a hugely entertaining - though slightly uneven - ride through the testosterone screen style of the past that avoids (almost) every urge to dip into nostalgia.

The core of the film revolves around Stallone and his core team - Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Randy Couture and Terry Crews. Within that group, the dominant focus falls on Stallone and Statham, who make for a fantastic one-two punch, with Li and Lundgren existing one tier below, while Crews and Couture and largely relegated to being 'The Other Guys'. In Couture's case this is a good decision as the man can't act a lick and every spoken line he gets is awkward in the extreme. Crews, however, is fantastic and more than deserving of a larger role. Crews is handed something that would have gone to Carl Weathers back in his Action Jackson days and he takes a relatively small part and manages to steal a number of scenes with his very charismatic work. If there are going to be Expendables spin off films - something that seems quite likely - then Crews' Hale Cesar character deserves priority on that front.

On the fringes of the group is Mickey Rourke as Tool, a former operative himself who now runs the world's fastest tattoo parlor - seriously, pay attention to how long it takes him to complete Stallone's back piece - while also acting as the group's go-between with potential clients. For the most part Rourke is just screwing around here but he fits well with the general tone of the world while also throwing in a couple of very casual, "Oh, damn, there's a REAL actor in this!" moments.

On the villain side, David Zayas - you know him from Dexter - plays a puppet general dancing at the end of Eric Roberts' string with Steve Austin lurking in the background to ensure compliance. While Zayas is a great big cliche and Austin exists in this movie largely just to set up the obligatory - but damn good, nonetheless - Austin versus Couture fight in the finale, Eric Roberts chews up the scenery as a classically evil action villain.

Beyond letting Couture speak, the one major mis-step in the casting is the presence of Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger. If they'd left this as a surprise for fans walking into the theater, they may have gotten away with it, but having included it in the advertising campaign reveals it as the bad publicity stunt and descent into bad nostalgia that it really is. Both Bruce and Arnold are here in purely throw-away characters, with Arnold in particular having nothing at all worthwhile to do. It's as though the trio of action stars simply happened to be available for a couple of hours on the same days and Stallone talked the other two into coming by the set. The scene is horribly written, flatly staged and poorly performed. If they spent longer than an hour on it from start to finish then I'll be shocked beyond words. Thankfully it is also brief.

On the action front, Stallone does an excellent job of blending styles and set pieces to show off the unique real life skills of his stars while also throwing in a series of increasingly fantastical pieces. The airplane assault of the island pier is an excellent example of the logic-suspending bits of the film, bits which only get bigger and louder as things progress until we get to an absolutely daft - but completely, one hundred percent inspired - moment involving Stallone, Crews, a moat of fire, a tank shell and a helicopter in the finale. It is sheer lunacy of the stand up and cheer variety.

Throughout his career Stallone has proven himself capable of producing some surprisingly sharp, nuanced work. This is not one of those films. Where The Expendables is smart is not in the script or the story but in Stallone understanding exactly what his audience wants and then pulling out all the stops to give it to them. A good film? Honestly, probably not. But entertaining? Oh, hell yes.

At Mubi

17 Comments

user-pic

Action films are the best films ever made, period!!!!

Nice. This is exactly what I was expecting and hoping for. A fun, action movie with everyone in it - thank God not dipping into farcical territory.

It's too bad Bruce and Governor get the shaft though. They are staples of this sub-genre and deserve more.

user-pic

This review brings to mind the wonderful catchphrase for Ronseal in the UK; "It does exactly what it says on the tin" and I am exceedinly pleased that it does. I wouldn't want something that tried to be smarter than it is or acts as a parody of the classics. Let us hope this won't be the last of its kind.

Where did you see the film by the way Todd. Was it an early preview or the finished product? Another question which comes to mind and what you didn't address; how does Jet Li fair in this? His previous record in Western films has not exactly been stellar. I never expected him to be a central character but I hope that he holds his own and his true skills are on display. Otherwise great review.

user-pic

I saw an early screening of the fully finished film about a week ago, it was just embargoed until today. As for Jet, he does okay. Not spectacular, but okay. He gets some funny lines and a good amount of screen time on the tier below Stallone and Statham. His big featured fight is against Dolph Lundgren, and Corey Yuen choreographed that, which I hadn't realized until the credits rolled.

Li vs Lundgren? Choreographed by Yuen? I have GOT to see this. Thanks for the heads up Todd

user-pic

You'll wish you could see it when you eventually do. For something heralded as a throwback to old school action, it sure was disappointingly full of rapid cut shakycam bullshit. File the THE EXPENDABLES next to NINJA ASSASSIN in the "tremendous waste of potential" box. OK, that's cruel... it's better than NINJA ASSASSIN, but when your action movie to end all action movies is more enjoyable when everyone's standing around talking than it is when they're actioning (with a few notable exceptions), you're probably doing it wrong. And it's obvious that it was filmed with a PG-13 in mind. Most of the carnage that puts it over the line into R territory is mid-grade CG, except for the stuff that's not quite good enough to classify as mid-grade.



EXPENDABLES isn't without merit. It was nice to see Jet Li get to be funny - something he's good at and doesn't get to do nearly often enough. Terry Crews is underutilized but makes up for it with the metric ton of destruction he unleashes. Eric Roberts is perfect casting. But the more I think about the good things in the movie, the more of a letdown the bad becomes. It's so much less than the sum of its parts. And at no point does anything at all ever feel like it's actually at stake. Rarely am I offered so little to care about in a film.

user-pic

Was that even Li fighting? The height gag was entertaining, but everything about the fight was completely hidden. The skills of Li, Dolph and Corey were not put to good use here. And I guess you say the same for most of the film. Up until Crews uses his bad ass weapon in the tunnels (which was about the only "wow" bit), very little happens which is of any interest. Most the action till then was pretty lame and unimaginative.

Statham and Rourke felt like the only two decent characters in the film, and Statham came across as the best fighter. You could have removed Crews and Couture completely since they do very little, have nearly no screen time, and some of the worst dialogue in the film. In fact, over half the time the dialogue is awkward at best. It wasn't even "so bad it's good" dialogue. Funnily enough for me it was Li who had the best and most memorable lines in the film.


I probably would have enjoyed it far more with less awkward dialogue and less frame cuts in the fight scenes. I wasn't actually expecting much and I was still slightly disappointed. The last 15-20 mins managed to elevate it slightly. And to be honest, in a film like this I was expecting outtakes during the credits. They obviously had great fun doing the film, so why not show some funny outtakes? Here in Sweden we actually received a personal video message from Dolph before the film began and it was extremely entertaining. Shame there wasn't more of that in the film.

user-pic

Jet Li's best movie in the U.S has got to be "Kiss Of The Dragon" and "Unleashed." Both those films alone would get him into the action hall of fame!!!

user-pic

If it's entertaining and worth the time and money, then it's a good film.

Really hope Crews starts getting his own movies(Heard they're remaking Commando, yo FOX, wink wink, nudge nudge!)

When I saw Gamer, my friends and I were rolling on the floor from all his lines, and when he died(sorry those who haven' t seen it) it was tragic. The guy is made of charisma, and desereves to be made a star rather than a dead body like in Terminator Salvation.

user-pic

Rest assured, Crews has THE signature moment in this film. The bit everyone will be talking about is his.

user-pic

Nothing against Couture but, Bass Rutten SHOULD had been in that role.

Saw this last night, was a fun film which had some great mark out moments. Heres a few questions, points etc:

* Was Li doubled in his fight against Lundgren as there were quite a few shots where they didn't show his head and that always makes me wonder if a person is getting doubled.

* (spoiler) Wasn't Coture shot in the back during the tunnel bit, was a little dark but sure looked like it?

* good to see Daniels get to show of alot of his skills

user-pic

The Expendables sucked ass!!! Try zooming the fuck out once in awhile Sly is it that hard?? I want to see the whole frame not snippets of bullshit action scenes.. Man oh man was the fight scene a big disappointment...

user-pic

Well, The Expendables was an extremely poorly shot, badly edited mess... The fights and action scenes are well choregraphied, but we can't see anything of what's going on, the shaky-cam was truly horrible... The movie was very disappointing..

For a movie that is supposed to be a nod to the 80's, Stallone forgot the most important part of what made the 80's action movies so enjoyable, is that, back then, we could actually see and follow the action scenes.. He shot The Expendable with the mentality of going "reality shooting and editing", which makes the movie impossible to enjoy...

Being a great fan of classic action, and all the actors in it, i had huge expectations of this film, ironically it was a huge letdown. Bad camera shots, awful, awful storyline, undeveloped characters, all talk and no action are the virtues of a film that had the potential to go down in history, as rambo, die hard, and predator. Instead these stone cold mercenaries who have supposedly killed thousands in their lives, go to save an island they spend 5 minutes in for no good reason. On their team they Jet Lee, a 7 time word tai chi champion who fights nothing like Jason Statham, the guy who went to acting school. I mean i like the guy but come on.
Surprisingly the only good parts of the movie are when Dolph Lundgren is in the movie. The Expendables team image works well with the rugged roller door, tats and bikes, but perhaps it is missing a touch of Tarantino's magic. Stalone really should have asked for some advice from Quentin, who is a true master in giving a picture that cool, stylish, badass feel, which The Expendables desperately needed!

user-pic

Finally watched this last night and have to say massively enjoyable. All I take from it is a homage to the 80's classic action movies, great acting.. NO but I didnt care!!! I wanted to see shit blown up and guns rip people to pieces.... did I get that... YES, was I entertained... YES. Did I care the acting was shit... NO. I thought all the cinematography bar Stallones attempt to get in the sea plane, the fight sequences and awful building cgi, were excellent, the car chase and that plane sequences were a gem to watch.


Leave a comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails