Serbis

Mother Review

by Charles Webb, April 29, 2010 3:27 PM


The masterfully-composed frames of Joon-ho Bong's latest always succeeds in drawing the eye - but just as often this unconventional thriller fails at drawing in the viewer's emotions. Centering on a mother's attempts to protect her mentally challenged son after he's accused of murder, superlative acting and direction can't redeem what feels like an underwritten story.

Hye-ja Kim plays the title role, an herbalist and unlicensed acupuncturist who finds herself up against a lazy, uninterested police force and a generally unsympathetic community after a teenage girl is murdered. Her son, Do-joon (Bin Won) becomes the prime suspect after being seen following the victim and leaving a piece of evidence with his name on it near the scene.

The story is in many ways the other side of Bong's brilliant Memories of Murder which showed rural police ineptitude attempting to right itself in the face of a series of heinous crimes. Here, it's the most powerless citizen attempting to right judicial ineptitude in order to save a victim who can't fully speak for himself. Do-joon's is a functional handicap, but he has lapses in memory, making it easy for the police to convince him to sign a confession.

Sadly, Bong's vision feels a bit unrefined and unfocused here. Where the previous film was able to glide expertly between farce and wrenching drama, here it feels like the tone bounces back and forth. It's hard to connect with Mother and son when the scenes tilt so frequently between scenes.

More problematic still, Do-joon never really rises above being characterized as a buffoon, making him an unsympathetic victim. He's cruel to his mother, ingratiating to his thug friend Jin-tae (Goo Jin), and all hands with any available female. Pop star Bin Won gamely does his best in the role, but his handsomeness is actually a distraction, transforming the character from someone with mental issues to one who's just unpleasant.

If there is one area the film succeeds it's in the performance by Hye-ja Kim as the title character. She's the linchpin that holds the film together, selling the treacly bits and conveying the absolute love of a mother for her son. Her performance deserves a better script, quite honestly.

The genius of Joon-ho Bong's previous work has been its means of manipulating moods and tone while expertly conveying character in a generally magnificent visual style. Unfortunately, Mother only delivers on the style and not so much the substance.          

At Mubi

11 Comments

Really good review. I was pretty disappointed by this film, especially since the mood of the trailer reminded me of Memories of Murder. Mother comes nowhere close to that masterpiece.

user-pic

Sadly, it's really hard to not measure this movie against Memories of Murder given how similar they are. And this one just comes out lacking.

user-pic

What? A "better scrip"? No idea what you mean when the script is clever, intelligent, mature and full of interesting ideas. The moral dilemmas the character of the mother faces, the implications of her actions. That you are dismissing all this just speaks more about your lack of attention, not about the movie doing something wrong. Also, movies don't need charcaters you can "relate" to, that's what sitcoms and soap operas are for, a good movie needs an engaging character, and Mother has them. The entire process of the investigation was just a thrill to watch, how everything comes together, how every character, even the smallest, are rich on detail.

I love Memories of Murder, but Mother is far more ambitious in what is aiming at. Stop comparing the two and just judge each other for what they are, not for what they aren't.

user-pic

No work exists in a vacuum and in this case "Mother" exists in a sort of continuity with "MoM."

Having said that, "Mother" remains part of that category of well-made movies that just aren't very good. In spite of its ambition it's not much in the way of a mystery and any moral dilemma is rendered moot when we know from the opening frames that the lead will do anything to protect her son.

I'll say again it lacks a character one can connect to - one whose story the viewer is interested in following for the duration of the movie. While Hye-ja Kim's performance is splendid, it's in service to a role that has very little in the way of shading.

user-pic

No, each movie might revolve around a crime, but each movie is aiming at different things. It's a disservice to both movies to evaluate the merits of one based on how well the previous film did. Mother is not a "spiritual sequel" they share some similar themes, and that's about it.

Also, it's not just pointless to say that you could "predict" everything the character the mother says right from the opening frames. The movie is never trying to hide that she will do anything for the son, but it is how the situation developes what truly gives a lot of weight to the character and her actions. Also, her relation with the son is far more complex from what it looks. So once more, this is not a matter of predicting anything, is a matter of seeing the actions and the motivations behind the actions.

As for lacking a character to connect, once more, that's the way you approach characters in a story, but is your way, not a rule. I can't say i relate to a character like Frank from Once Upon a Time in the West because, well, i'm not a murderer among other things, but the character is interesting to watch, and there's a world of difference in that alone. All the characters in Mother were interesting to follow, i guess we could say to each of it's own, but you can't imply that they were poorly written because they weren't. You just didn't like them, is a purely visceral reaction from you, nothing more.

user-pic

I'm with you, Chevalier. While I can't admit to relating directly to any of the characters, that's not the reason I watch films. This was as masterful as anything Bong Joon-ho has done. As a character study, it was marvelous...Kim Hye-ja seriously knocked one out of the park. Sure there were parallels to Memories of Murder, but also to The Host and Barking Dogs Never Bite. Bong simply likes pointing out and often poking fun at the ineptitude of Korean law enforcement.

By the way, the Korean Blu-Ray of this is near reference level. The picture quality is great and the audio is a solid 10. For such a beautiful film, it's worth it to own the best, and I doubt we'll be getting the dual-layer treatment when it comes our way, so don't hesitate to import now.

user-pic

A masterpiece, that needs to be seen twice at least to be fully appreciated. One of the 10 best movies of 2009, end of the story.

--but just as often this unconventional thriller fails at drawing in the viewer's emotions.--

That is a completely moronic statement. While I loved Memories Of Murder, perhaps more than this, this definitely has more emotional impact. I agree with some of your complaints about the Do-Joon character (although I don't think it lessened the film at all) but everything else you said comes off as ignorant.

I'm so sick of reviewers saying that there were no characters they could relate to (although I'm sure many mothers could relate to this one). It's become a bit of a reviewer cliche, and I generally dismiss those reviews as being written by pretentious know it alls who don't actually know that much about film at all. Sorry to be so harsh, and I haven't read any of your other reviews, so I can't say you're one of those people for sure, but with this one you certainly come off that way.
As for there being no characters interesting enough to carry viewers through the whole film... how high were you when you watched this? The mother was absolutely stunning in every aspect.
That isn't to say the film didn't have it's bad points, because it did, but you have seemed to criticize the aspects that make it stand out above other films.

Sorry, but this was a straight up awful, albeit well-written review.

user-pic

Thanks for reading, I guess?

Here's the thing that gets me: you loved the movie, you're over the moon about it and that's cool. I approached the movie from another direction, and found it a bit listless, but well-made and well-acted.

The movie failed to grab my emotions because some of the characters were a little toxic (I almost came to hate the son by the second act, and the mother is something of a doormat , which always takes me out of a viewing experience). Sorry, but after a while the sad-sack indomitable spirit noise was just grating on my nerves. Just simply forming the basis around a mother-son relationship wasn't enough to pull at my heartstrings - it was missing something, anything that connected me to the plight of the characters.

As for anyone else who disagrees with the review, thanks for reading, but please, don't go down the incredibly boring path of the "you're wrong, and your review is wrong" line of comments--I'm not wrong about how this movie impacted me (and here's the amazing part), but NEITHER ARE YOU.

I love to discuss and debate the merits of a movie - I wouldn't be writing for this most excellent site otherwise. But please don't make the dick move of throwing insults in with your disagreement because your world view can't for some reason take someone finding fault with your sacred cows.

I didn't love the movie; I liked it, because it drew me in, and I found the mother enthralling. I certainly wasn't over the moon about it, and now you're just putting words in my mouth to better suit your argument. And I never criticized you personally, just your reviewing method, which is wholly unoriginal for the reasons I stated.
Reviewers are always slamming films for having no relatable characters, which whether you like it or not, is a very unoriginal and uninspired argument. You do come off as 'just another reviewer' writing things like that.
Reading negative reviews doesn't bother me so much if the points the reviewer makes are correct, but when they just touch on the same crap every other hack reviewer does it's annoying. It might as well be an imdb review.
Criticizing the film because the son was unsympathetic is also wrong, as we're meant to sympathize with the mother and her plight.

I'll just say I wasn't going to post until I read your response to Chevalier, which immediately lessoned my opinion on your original review. It really is ignorant.

user-pic

Not being able to go along with the film because you can't sync with any of the characters IS a problem. If characters have a lack of shading, personality, or relateability (note, I didn't say "likeability," and that's an important distinction) and this is something that comes up frequently in reviews, maybe, just maybe that's endemic of a weakness is certain corners of filmmaking.


As to the point about relateability: Travis Bickle is a son of a bitch, and I wouldn't want to spend any time with Michael Rooker's Henry. But I DO want to know what's going on in the stories of these crazy fuckers because the scripts and performances give me points of investment. I felt nothing like that here, nothing to latch onto.


Your mileage, as they say, varied.


As to the personal insults, perhaps I was being thin-skinned but being accused of being high while watching the movie kind of gets filed under "insult" where I'm from. My take on that was that you as a reader were making assumptions about my level of attention to the film. Yes, you and I watched the same movie and we came away with different opinions.


"Criticizing the film because the son was unsympathetic is also wrong, as we're meant to sympathize with the mother and her plight."


Well, point of fact, her motivation is the son's safety, and as the viewer we're supposed to have a stake, an investment in seeing things come out alright for the son. There should be some reason we want to see him come through okay - but the film never delivered this for me (a combination of the way his role was written, and the problematic casting).


It's a lesser film in the director's oeuvre, is what I'm sayin'.


Leave a comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails