Dear middle America,
As you peruse your local movie listings this Martin Luther King Day weekend, you may find yourself considering Peter Jackson's THE LOVELY BONES, which opens in 'wide release' (your neck of the woods,) after over a month of 'limited release' (elite coastal movie theaters.) Red Staters, we've never really seen eye to eye. You probably think I'm a homosexual just for having a blog. But in the spirit of bipartisanship, nah, hell, call it patriotism, I'm warning y'all: Stay away from these LOVELY BONES.
Here, for your entertainment, is an awful mess. It's the story of Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan,) a fourteen year-old girl murdered on her way home from school. Following her death, Susie tours "the in-between," a region neither heaven nor hell (though for me it was decidedly on the 'hell' side,) all while trying to communicate with her grieving parents Mark Wahlberg & Rachel Weisz, and help them solve the mystery of her death at the hands of the Salmon's next-door serial kill-neighbor George Harvey (Stanley Tucci.)
Though effectively half his film is devoted to Susie's experience in the afterlife, (an expansion of the source novel's narrative framing device,) Jackson establishes no rules or structure for this 'in-between' world, choosing instead to present it as a series of computer-generated hyper-pastorals through which Susie meanders... seeing things that really aren't amazing, and meeting characters such as perky Asian spirit guide "Holly Golightly" (Nikki SooHoo)... who really isn't interesting.
Some badly needed suspense arrives in the last act, with Susie's sister Lindsey (Rose McIver) creeping through Harvey's home in a scene not undone by its implausibility, but by its inconsequence. The evidence Lindsey retrieves has almost zero bearing in the plot. The same lax causality goes for much of THE LOVELY BONES. The efforts of Susie to alert her family to her killer, eventually, go nowhere; Harvey's final comeuppance has barely anything to do with her plot line. This makes Susie, and her parents, not to mention Michael Imperioli's pointless police detective, ultimately impotent figures - and given how much screen time is allotted to Harvey and his devilry, it's hard to have sympathy for protagonists who are so banally bereaved they can't see a monster in their midst.
Between the sixteen endings of RETURN OF THE KING, and the 790-minute Empire State Building climax of KING KONG, it's fair to say that extended death scenes have become Peter Jackson's forté. I'm a sucker for his KONG - but the scene of Susie Salmon's abduction and murder is hard to classify as entertainment. And yet THE LOVELY BONES is not a bad film because of objectionable subject matter. It is a bad film because it's the sum of uniformly bad artistic choices:
The cinematography is a sloppy muddle, with cameras moving when they
needn't and shouldn't, especially in domestic scenes. Sequences like
the killer's introduction, peering through the windows of a dollhouse,
are over-edited, where a simpler, cleaner presentation would do better.
The musical score by Brian Eno is off the mark in almost every moment -
most criminally, a 70's fabulous disco in heaven, set not to K.C. and
the Sunshine Band, but to classical strings (AS BAD AS IT SOUNDS.)
Worse still is Susie Salmon's ceaseless voice over. The post-mortem
narrator's been done before, but it's hard to think of a more
miscalculated application than this. Though Penn & Teller urge us
to politely golf clap whenever the title of a film is worked into its
dialogue, when Susie announces, apropos to nothing at film's end, "these are the lovely bones..." and then attempts to briefly unpack that statement, the only possible response is to groan - not clap.
Though Saoirse Ronan and the always-great Tucci both impress, the rest of the cast fails to leave any mark. Their jobs aren't made any easier by Mister Directorpants, who treats the Salmon clan as if each of them has to have one broad characteristic, like a surly dwarf or hungry Hobbit: Wahlberg's consumed by rage, Weisz is detached yet also aloof, and Susan Sarandon is the grandmother who's too fabulous to grieve, or even mention her granddaughter's murder. She causes hilaaarious havoc around the Salmon home: washing machines overflow, dishes shatter, small fires pop up. In such an aggressively sentimental film, that this MR. MOM-esque montage passes for comic relief shows just how far Jackson has come from his bizarre beginnings.
But then, Peter Jackson hasn't attempted anything less than Huge in the last ten years of his life. And though it was one of the true cinematic treats of the '00's to see a filmmaker with oddball sensibilities and a taste for macabre do Huge right, Jackson's latest is a smaller, sadder tale, which he insists on Huge-ifying - with sweeping visuals but no eye for detail. He may be attempting a return from Middle, to regular Earth with THE LOVELY BONES, but when it comes to portraying reality, Jackson's a stranger in a strange land.
Review cross-posted at Steven Spielblog:
http://stevenspielblog.wordpress.com/
More from The Lovely Bones
- Reviews: THE LOVELY BONES review


Christ on a stick, if every review site that I give a damn about isn't saying the exact same thing about this film (well, aintitcool threw it some love but they almost don't count anymore)!
"It aint the actors folks! No, this film's implosion lies squarely on Jackson's shoulders". Or some variation of that sentiment.
It's a shame really. The book wasn't THAT good, but it did have it's moments. Oh well, movin' on!
Thanks for the heads up Mr. Yolen.
I haven't seen the film, but this is what I was worried about. The subject matter is very delicate and difficult to do well.
"Georgia Rules" is a film that handled child abuse very well, without being preachy.
This is not a subject matter that demands flash...
Amen. This review nails it.
The preview looked beyond atrocious. The scenes of 'heaven' looked so overtly cliche and 'Avatar' creepy, I almost longed for hell... if not for one brief moment.
It's pronounced fort, not for-tay. That accent shouldn't be there. This is precisely the wrong place and the wrong tone of voice to allow such a bourgeoisie mistake.
Turns out Jackson is not a good director after all... King Kong was lame, and I can't even sit through lord of the rings. I have to turn it off once I see some ogre in front of a black screen and smoke machine edited together with a shot comprised entirely from CG with no attention to physics or lifelike movement. Star Wars has the same phoney CG garbage that's poorly directed and poorly animated.
Avatar was the only movie that can even create life like CG, and if you can't do that honestly your better off using claymation and models.
If your effects are going to look totally fake, they might as well be physical works of art instead. Spike Jonze got it right.
Sharokham, really? Both pronunciations are accepted, and it's often seen written with the accent. Yes, its current pronunciation likely stemmed from the musical term, but that doesn't make it any less valid. But anyway, grammar aside, it was the first paragraph of this article that made me cringe. I'm not a native of the area (I've lived all over the US and outside of it), but am currently living in the bible belt. While there are definitely a few people around here that fit the stereotype described, there are many more people that are open to different cultures and beliefs. I just get a little tired of the cheap shots at the South (and "middle America" in this case), and seeing an article like this on Twitch is a little disappointing. Don't get me wrong, I'm not offended, just tired of the "Us vs. Them" mentality.