Some films are best approached without knowing
anything about it. The Fourth Kind is such a film, so unless you really
want to know, I advise to watch first, read after. I found this film
through the small buzz it generated online but paid little attention to
it until finally the occasion presented itself to watch the film.
Needless to say I was pleasantly surprised with the result.
Film is make-belief, by nature. But once in a while a director tries to trick his audience into actually believing they're watching something real. Just think Blair Witch Project and Cannibal Holocaust. Enter The Fourth Kind, which goes head to head with Paranormal Activities to win best 2009 entry in this specific category. And while I was bored to death by Paranormal Activities, The Fourth Kind goes way beyond and does a way better job at succeeding in its goals.
The setup of the film is pretty much brilliant. Rather than play the "found footage" card, Osunsanmi makes his film a reenactment of archive footage, enriched with audio fragments and the so-called actual archive material. He turns his film into a sensationalist TV-show creating a strange and new sense of reality. This draws away the attention from faults in the recorded material which effectively destroyed a film like Paranormal Activities.
The story is that of a little town in Alaska, coping with a series of abductions over a pretty long period of time. Abigail Tyler is a psychologist continuing the work of her late husband, looking into the strange disappearances. Through several of her sessions we learn that a good few people in the town suffer from insomnia, linked to the appearance of an rather ominous owl. That's when things start to go wrong for Dr Tyler.
Visually it's a pretty interesting film. By using split screens to show both archive footage and reenacted footage in the same shot, Osunsanmi manages to slip in a sense of realness that would've been lost otherwise. On top of that, he is still able to use some cool tricks and effects in the reenacted footage so the audience doesn't have to sit through 90 minutes of interviews and amateur camera work. A perfect trade-off.
The soundtrack is pretty cool too, with atmospheric audio fragments running together with the regular scenes. Again it creates a certain sense of reality that logically shouldn't be there. The score itself is decent enough, but nothing too spectacular. Typical moody background music usually found in a film like this. Acting is strong and believable in the realm of the film. Seeing how there's different layers of reality though, it's actually a bit tricky to get a firm grip on the quality of the actors' performances.
While the idea of The Fourth Kind isn't too original, the execution surely is. It's pretty much a hit and miss affair which will win as much supporters as it will spawn haters, but for me it worked miraculously well. Watching the film knowing that it's all a big hoax is like watching a cunning trick revealed. Osunsanmi aims sharp when he tries to fool his audience and makes his film into a enthralling experience.
Best to judge for yourself though. How you go into the film will have a big influence on your appreciation. If you don't like the trick Osunsanmi is pulling you'll quite probably hate it. But if you go along with it, emerging yourself in the mystery of the little town, there are plenty of creepy and uneasy scenes to be enjoyed. Essentially The Fourth Kind is a splendid "less is more" horror flick, though Osunsanmi's trickery is actually anything but "less is more".
Film is make-belief, by nature. But once in a while a director tries to trick his audience into actually believing they're watching something real. Just think Blair Witch Project and Cannibal Holocaust. Enter The Fourth Kind, which goes head to head with Paranormal Activities to win best 2009 entry in this specific category. And while I was bored to death by Paranormal Activities, The Fourth Kind goes way beyond and does a way better job at succeeding in its goals.
The setup of the film is pretty much brilliant. Rather than play the "found footage" card, Osunsanmi makes his film a reenactment of archive footage, enriched with audio fragments and the so-called actual archive material. He turns his film into a sensationalist TV-show creating a strange and new sense of reality. This draws away the attention from faults in the recorded material which effectively destroyed a film like Paranormal Activities.
The story is that of a little town in Alaska, coping with a series of abductions over a pretty long period of time. Abigail Tyler is a psychologist continuing the work of her late husband, looking into the strange disappearances. Through several of her sessions we learn that a good few people in the town suffer from insomnia, linked to the appearance of an rather ominous owl. That's when things start to go wrong for Dr Tyler.
Visually it's a pretty interesting film. By using split screens to show both archive footage and reenacted footage in the same shot, Osunsanmi manages to slip in a sense of realness that would've been lost otherwise. On top of that, he is still able to use some cool tricks and effects in the reenacted footage so the audience doesn't have to sit through 90 minutes of interviews and amateur camera work. A perfect trade-off.
The soundtrack is pretty cool too, with atmospheric audio fragments running together with the regular scenes. Again it creates a certain sense of reality that logically shouldn't be there. The score itself is decent enough, but nothing too spectacular. Typical moody background music usually found in a film like this. Acting is strong and believable in the realm of the film. Seeing how there's different layers of reality though, it's actually a bit tricky to get a firm grip on the quality of the actors' performances.
While the idea of The Fourth Kind isn't too original, the execution surely is. It's pretty much a hit and miss affair which will win as much supporters as it will spawn haters, but for me it worked miraculously well. Watching the film knowing that it's all a big hoax is like watching a cunning trick revealed. Osunsanmi aims sharp when he tries to fool his audience and makes his film into a enthralling experience.
Best to judge for yourself though. How you go into the film will have a big influence on your appreciation. If you don't like the trick Osunsanmi is pulling you'll quite probably hate it. But if you go along with it, emerging yourself in the mystery of the little town, there are plenty of creepy and uneasy scenes to be enjoyed. Essentially The Fourth Kind is a splendid "less is more" horror flick, though Osunsanmi's trickery is actually anything but "less is more".


Nice review! I just watched this film today and it caught me off gaurd in a huge way. I'm not a jumpy one but I was catching myself tenseing up like I had been tasered and grinding my teeth in a, "holy shit!" moment.
Huge dissapointment for me, I found it cliched & predictable, it deserved nothing more than to be a made for tv or sci-fi channel fare.
If it had been an X-files episode or two, I would have been more impressed than I was, as the acting was terrible at times, Duchovney and Anderson would have done the material some justice I'm sure, but this kind of fare is 10-15 years too late to have any kind of effect.
The ending was a non event, the film just fizzled out with a pathetic wimper.
To be churning this kind of rubbish out, in the age of District 9 et al, is a major backward step, it's as if someone thought, "I know lets do the Blair Witch meets X-Files via the Hallmark channel" !! And before you say I'm just a sci-fi hater, I do actually like sci-fi, but this was just an insult to my intelligence. 3/10
dude great review - i completely agree. i was very impressed by THE FOURTH KIND. by immediately acknowledging that the movie is fake, but then continually inserting the so called "real" footage/audio juxtaposed against the fake movie footage, the audience is consistently in an uneasy grey area where you are forced to consider what you are viewing whether you believe it or not. it's the type of audience tampering that would absolutely delight the late, great William Castle. i had a lot of fun watching it. at the least it's a great exercise in pushing the "found footage" genre.
I really wanted to like this film, and I am usually the kind of filmgoer who gives everything I pay my hard earned cash on a fighting chance. I was intrigued by the premise and the TV spots, and this was the first cinema experience I had in over a year.
However, it didn't work for me at all, no sir. I found the constant switching to 'archive footage' distracting as I kept having my disbelief suspension... suspended. It was also annoying when anything good happened on the 'archive' footage, the tape would be affected by the phenomenon, so that we actually never got to see anything, thereby giving us less than if this were an actual recreation of a 'real' event.
It got to the point where I was almost crying out at how bad I thought it was, but it would have done no good - the cinema was virtually empty by this point as many people left... obviously their cash was ill-gotten and they didn't care if they wasted it by not sitting through until the bitter end as I always do.
I admire the director and the cast for their commitment to the idea, and I was really rooting for it. I found Paranormal Activity a more 'honest' attempt at the found footage genre even though it threw it away in the final few minutes
Was this a clever marketing Hollywood movie scheme? Perhaps..As an author of Secret Societies Exposed, Ufologist, Cult Investigator and former law enforcement, I conclude that this movie has profound merits as depicted with their representation of plausible events. Like so, there is no doubt that the film challenges our imagination with the premise of science VS fiction. Nonetheless, we are always fascinated with such mysteries of the paranormal and the universe! Like so, the acting was superb!! I have performed multiple field investigations of such paranormal anomalies and found Parapsychological evidence to support such claims even thought there are many claims that are classified as hoax.
Im also a Senior Paranormal Investigator with the Florida Paranormal Research Foundation and there are plenty of cases that exist that are beyond scientific and logical comprehension! Interestingly, the real AKA Dr. Tyler never received sufficient assistance in her case and was dismiss by officials since this type of conspiracy theory can never be ascertained by officials, FBI or government. Thus, can you Imagine the social crisis and religious pandemonium that would develop if the government was to confirm that Aliens are real! Subsequently, the Church will also lose its multibillion dollar a year franchises. In conclusion, the truth is out there....
Seek and thou shall find. I would like to find the real A.K.A. Dr. Abigail Tyler and re-open this cold case file in order for her to receive closure on her misfortune events! She deserves that much!
Charles Del Campo
Cult Investigator.
Paranormalpsy@aol.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWlbmmla9k0&feature=player_embedded
Tell ya what I went into this movie last night thinking it was real footage being showed in it, I really thought these events really occurred. That being said I thought the movie was done brilliantly! I absolutely got into this movie mind, body, and heart. It was so freaky and creepy, the best alien based movie I have ever seen! You actually get sucked in to the whole Nome. Alaska mystery and start to believe these people and you actually start to feel their pain and start to feel bad for them as fellow human beings! I did not find out this was a hoax until I was so awe struck and taken back from the film, that when it was over I immediately when onto the internet to try and delve deeper into the story! Needless to say I soon found out it was fake (LOL) The unfortunate thing is people who go and read reviews on this film before they watch will learn that it is fake before actually watching it, and getting pleasantly sucked into the storyline. But for those who just watch it without knowing that it is not real will love it! I give this movie 5 stars and would recommend it to anyone, and just give everyone who reads this a little piece of advice, If you have already watched it don't ruin the experience for someone else by telling them it's fake, Let them go into the film thinking that these are true events that happened in a small hidden little town in Alaska!