Ghost In The Shell: Innocence

PUNISHER: WAR ZONE review

by Jim Tudor, December 5, 2008 3:25 PM


I didn’t expect to be surprised by “Punisher: War Zone”, the latest comic book movie sequel that no one asked for. So, was my face ever red upon leaving the theater. Not from all the gratuitously splattered blood, mind you, no, it was actually from laughing so hard. Who know the Punisher could be so funny? That’s right, folks, “Punisher: War Zone” is the most unintentionally hilarious film I’ve seen in a long time. Exploding hooligans… Joel Schumacher’s “Batman” color palette… Bad over-acting by the truckload… Muddled religious overtones… All directed by a world-renowned kickboxing champion! What more could anyone want in a compulsively watchable horrible movie?

Let’s back up a little. Four years ago, Marvel and Lionsgate brought us “The Punisher”, starring Thomas Jane as the titular gun-toting comic book anti-hero. The film inexplicably relocated Frank Castle (for the uninitiated, that’s Punisher’s real name) away from his traditional New York stomping ground to Miami, where he would pursue a villainous John Travolta with not only guns, but also fake fire hydrants and popsicle-based torture. The film had its share of problems, but on the whole, it wasn’t a complete train wreck. Thomas Jane showed promise as Castle, and it was, at the very least, passable. I thought, perhaps Jane would get a better script for the sequel (which would hopefully feature the comic’s big-bad, the disfigured mob boss Jigsaw) and there he would truly be allowed to shine. After all, I’m fairly certain there’s a decent movie that could be made from “The Punisher” comics. But here we are, three attempts in (counting the 1989 Dolph Lundgren effort), and despite the filmmakers’ creatively firing in every direction, they’ve yet to hit anything resembling the target.

Grossly overcompensating for Jane’s Punisher’s perceived lack of brutality, Ray Stevenson’s version wastes no time getting to the bloodshed. In an early sequence that defines the tone for the remainder of the film, Punisher crashes a big fancy mob boss dinner party by first cutting the power, then igniting a red roman candle to illuminate his string of gory slayings that would make Jason Voorhees envious. This Punisher doesn’t just shoot everyone in the room, oh no - he gets creative. Found tabletop objects through skulls, rammed into throats, etc. When he finally does cut lose with his machine guns in this sequence, he opts to do so while hanging upside-down from a strange chandelier, spinning around and around. In slow motion, of course. It’s one of those techniques one only sees in a certain type of low-level action film, and brother, this is that film. Is it any wonder Thomas Jane reported passed on this?

But all of that isn’t what surprised me. I was surprised by how out and out ridiculous this movie got. There are numerous scenes that push the forced bad-ass style and unrelenting gore to such extremes, one can only laugh. This film may actually have an embarrassing future on video as a dorm room mock-fest. Pin all of the blame on director Lexi Alexander, who never figures out what kind of film this really should be. She lights every set with unmotivated swaths of primary colored lighting like some kind of fourth rate Mario Bava wannabe. The production designer apparently never met a tube of neon he didn’t love, as every sign and window edge in the film is aglow with the stuff. This is the last comic book property that should have this sort of Joel Schumacher “Batman” visual scheme. (If anything, “The Punisher” may benefit by going the other direction, and sucking out most of the color.) But Alexander, like most of her hammy supporting cast, seems to be under the all-too-common impression that all comic books are golly-gee-whiz colorful, and hey, this is a comic book movie, so let’s go over-the-top kooky!

Actually, a few individuals actually make it through this mess unscathed. Ray Stevenson makes a solid, imposing Frank Castle (despite my affinity for Thomas Jane in the part, I’d actually give the edge to Stevenson), and Wayne Knight and Julie Benz, neither of whom needs this crap on their resumes, are just fine in their supporting parts. It’s the actors playing the many villains (read: cannon-fodder) that are problematic, starting at the top of the heap, with Dominic West in the long-awaited part of Jigsaw. However great West may’ve been on “The Wire” (and I hear he was pretty good), he’s pretty awful here. Following the lead of Tim Blake Nelson in “The Incredible Hulk” or Tommy Lee Jones in “Batman Forever”, West hams it up at every turn, taking a character that could thrive on slow-burn subtly, and instead chewing all the scenery in sight. The gross-out facial stitching and ill-fitting Dr. No tunic he takes to wearing don’t help, either. In this, he’s really just another big-headed, loud-mouthed Italian gangster, and one wonders why he should pose any more of a threat to Punisher than any bosses that were gunned down to make way for him.

To top it all off, (and you may chose not to believe this one, I understand that,) the Punisher not only goes to church, (!) but knows his scripture as well. Apparently this is an element the screenplay put in place to capitalize on Castle’s inadvertent killing of an undercover agent earlier in the film, but the result is, unsurprisingly, a murky mess of half-baked, failed symbolism. If the giant gaudy neon-tube cross the production obviously added to a classy cathedral interior isn’t bad enough, the groan-inducing last shot of the film certainly is.

“Punisher War Zone” is worse than I was ever expecting, and I had negative expectations for this. In a twisted way, this is a film that begs to be seen, if only for it’s status as being a case study in how not to make a comic book movie. (I know there is no shortage of bad comic book movies, but you will not have this much wrong-headed fun at “Catwoman” or “Judge Dredd”, I guarantee.) In all its utter badness, it’s never boring; I’ll give it that. Marvel was wise to label this “Marvel Knights” up front, not only allowing for the R-rating, but distancing it a bit from their A-list films like “Iron Man” and “Incredible Hulk”. So put aside any fanboy hopes for a Nick Fury or Tony Stark cameo at the end. (There is, however, a new song by Rob Zombie that will rock any of your remaining brains out.) I could be wrong, but this may very well be the last big budget studio effort ever to be helmed by a kickboxing champion. If that comes to pass, only then will justice truly be served.


- Jim Tudor


At Mubi

14 Comments

user-pic

I appreciate you might be expecting an 'across the board' accessibility regarding the audience for this film like Iron Man; but to me its obvious that you've not been following the latest outings of Frank Castle under the MAX label at Marvel...the colour scheme is picked out directly from those comics along with the OTT violence and religious over/undertones - Tim Bradstreet, for those that know of his work has been quoted saying that the way the film is lit/coloured is exactly the same way he lights/colours his photo shoots... Punisher 2004 was no better than Punisher 1989 with Dolph albeit Tom Jane nailed Castle in his version - its also worth noting that Tom Jane walked away from the sequel long before Lexi Alexander came on-board. I do actually have the script that was intended to be the sequel and its not that great at all. I appreciate you taking the time to review this film so quickly - but I'm taking your review with a heavy pinch of salt purely because I think you've watched despite having condemned it from the first frame onwards...

user-pic

Well, the neon does sounds pretty bad. And over the top stereotype villains as well.
Did they at least get the revenge theme right? That's the essential part of any Punisher movie if you ask me. They've killed his family, and he decides to kill all the criminals in the world in return. Not exactly a happy fellow.
They probably should have gotten the guy who directed Death Sentence to do this, but it doesn't sound that bad. It doesn't exactly have much to live up to either. At least not to me anyway. The two earlier Punisher movies where kinda awful.

user-pic

Why do you spend so much time writing about a horrible film? I'd rather read about something that you liked, something I'd actually want to see.

user-pic

Saw a preview yesterday. I love Garth Ennis' run on the Punisher and always enjoyed the idea of the character. But, it's been a campy, stupid comic that reads more like a parody. It anything it's a dumbed down, American version of Judge Dredd really.

And yeah, that movie was a train wreck. But this film "gets it" more than the previous two. I think the review over at Aintitcool sums it up pretty perfectly. It's laughably bad, but competently made, and I think it's self aware without being obnoxious about. Many are comparing this to Uwe Boll and Shumaker. I don't see that at all.

This flick isn't exactly good, but I had a damn hell of lot of fun. Did it do the character justice? I don't know, apart from Ennis's wicked humor, I never thought there was much to do justice. Castle's never had much of a deep story, he was a characicture to begin with.

I liked the film's color palette. It reminded me more of Del Toro's work on Blade 2 and the color scheme of Crow: City of Angels (shitty movie, but really pretty) more than Batman and Robin.

The movie's dumb, campy, and super super violent. It's right up the alley for most people who come to this site. I think it's getting trashed for being big budget and American. If this thing were Japanese are Italian, all the fanboys would be creaming their pants over it.

And I'll make a controversial statement that'll make people howl. Fuck Iron Man, this is far better than that overhyped dung heap. Yeah, Downey was good. But the film was edited like an episode of MTV cribs with a boring villian, little uninspired action. It was total amateur hour. But it preys on people's sentiments by adding Afganistan and having Iron Man fight the Taliban and redeem America for it's wayward military ways while remaining hopeful and patriotic. Cheap and manipulative, masking the fact that it's a boring, forgettable flick. At least War Zone gives the goods on action. Neither film has much of story.

user-pic

Jim, you couldn't have written a better review to whet my appetite. The first thing that came to my mind was that this sounds very much akin to those low-budget action films from the '80s that I (and many others here, I'm sure) love so much. Sounds like most everything I turn to the world of cinema for. If I wanted food for the mind, I'd read a book. Thanks!

user-pic

"If this thing were Japanese or Italian, all the fanboys would be creaming their pants over it."

So amazingly true. If this had Takeshi Miike's name on it and everything else was exactly the same, I think the critical reaction would be extremely different.

Everything I'm hearing indicates an offensively violent, goofy, not to be taken seriously film that's very true to its offensively violent, goofy, not to be taken seriously source material. PUNISHER: WAR ZONE just seems rather like a 21st-century STORY OF RICKY, by design. What do people expect here?

user-pic

I was really impressed by the performance of Mr. Stevenson, who actually is a trifle frightening rather than the "nice" punisher of Thomas Jane. Mr. Stevenson portrayed him like the monster that is Frank, like him or not. Still, I have to admit that the spinning chandelier was too much.

user-pic

That sounds super awesome. I take that review as positive after reading it. ;)

user-pic

I was totally expecting the reference to be 3000 Miles to Graceland. (was that how many miles it was?)

user-pic

Just saw the film, and holy crap is it glorious!! I think this is about as perfect a Punisher movie could ever hope to be. The Punisher was never as much about character, as about pretty much a shell of a man wrecking shop! And in my view i thought that this film was totally self aware of this note and basically injected a great sense of humor and over the top everything.

user-pic

Garth Ennis defined the Punish in my eyes and ever since his many runs on the character (Good and Bad) I've always viewed the Punisher as nothing more than a one dimensional killing machine on a straight and unwavering road. His lack of depth defines him. Thomas Jane's wishes for a more 'Taxi Driver' style story (with many scenes of the Punisher staring out at a rainy window with a gun in one hand, a bottle of liquor in the other and moistness around his eyes) is a whole other film then the comic ripped from the pages and put on the screen. The Punisher kills bad people, he does so violently and without mercy, that's what makes him the character that he is today. I can see the appeal of a gritty and grimy Punisher flick, but the appeal of a so called dumbed-down (but competently made ) neon covered Punisher enacting brutal acts of violence appeals to me on a completely different level. To completely disregard the film as retraded (which it may be) does not eliminate it's appeal as entertainment. Most of the reviews I've read mention "But it was REALLY entertaining" which begs me to ask: Uh? Isn't that the point at the end of the day sometimes? To be entertained? I'm sorry it didn't give me a medidation on the self-concious, but I was impressed by the amount of heads that exploded!

Does anyone like 3000 miles to Graceland? I found it in my DVD collection the other day and was a little terrified at the train of thought that must have been going through my mind when I put hard earned cash on a counter to own it in my grubby hands. Was I really that self-destructive?

user-pic

Miike’s movies usually have very well developed characters, not one dimensional cartoonish parodies of what human beings are suppose to be.

Although I love the director, I couldn't disagree more.
"Usually" is a strong word. Hopefully on a handful of his films he's not trying to develop characters because if that were his intention with a majority of his films, he would be ailing miserably. I love the guy though. I've liked every movie that I've seen of his so far. i just disagree with that statement.

user-pic

Of course not every single Miike movie has fully fleshed characters simply because some of his films didn't need characters that complex. But even on the most simplistic ones the characters are well defined. Now, for Miike movies that i would say have well made characters:

Audition
Ley Lines
Visitor Q
Dead or Alive trilogy (yes, even the third one)
The Happiness of the Katakuris
Blues Harp
The Bird People in China
Gozu
Zebraman

Even flawed affairs like Full Metal Yakuza took it's time to explore the main character. Every time i'm going to see a Miike movie i'm sure that there will be at least one or two characters that will stood out. Very rarely has i been dissapointed in that area. Creating memorable characters is a quality any good director must and should have.

user-pic

People kept claiming how this movie is exactly like Punisher MAX, even the director said it was an influence visually and story-wise.

Well fuck that shit, I read the entirety of Garth Ennis' run on Punisher MAX and it's nothing, NOTHING, like the movie. Not even the slightest bit, despite the superficial lifting of characters and names from the comic.

Now it would be a completely different story if we're talking about Ennis' run on Marvel Knight's Punisher.


Related Posts with Thumbnails