Azur & Asmar

THERE WILL BE BLOOD Review

by Todd Brown, December 5, 2007 7:00 AM


The opening of P.T. Anderson’s latest epic scaled drama plays like a challenge by Anderson to both himself and his devotees. After years of comparisons – both favorable and not – to Robert Altman thanks to his incredibly talky and multi-pronged scripts and a stint as Altman’s eyes and ears as a de facto second director on set of Altman’s final film – acting as eyes ears and hands for the aging director who spent the bulk of A Prairie Home Companion in an easy chair to preserve his failing health – Anderson takes the exact opposite approach on There Will Be Blood.

Opening with an extremely lengthy sequence played entirely without dialogue Anderson’s oil patch drama is, in many ways, an anti-Anderson film, one based on minimalist rhythm and tone and entirely absent Anderson’s trademark stylistic flourishes and pop culture savvy. It is an interesting approach for Anderson, one entirely at odds with his entire body of work to date. And, thanks in no small part to an absolutely riveting performance from Daniel Day Lewis, his willingness to change things up has resulted in arguably Anderson’s finest film to date, the high point of an already sterling career. The length, content, minimalist approach and lack of major star power virtually guarantee that it will die an ignoble death at the box office – a fate Anderson should be well familiar with by now – but financial success or no There Will Be Blood is a prototypical, archetypal example of purely American cinema at its finest.

Lewis is Daniel Plainview, a solitary, obsessive man drawn to California at the turn of the century in the height of the gold rush. His strike is successful, he hits gold at the bottom of his hand dug shaft but a fluke accident reveals something far more valuable. Without intending to do so Plainview has become an oil man, his fortune bubbling up from the base of the shaft. His initial chance strike parlayed into larger and larger wells over the years Plainview arrives in the failing town of Little Boston ten years later, accompanied by his middling-successful crew and the adopted, orphan son of a worker felled in an accident years before, drawn by the story of oil so plentiful that it literally seeps up trough the ground. Little Boston will both make and unmake Plainview’s life.

There Will Be Blood is a striking success both as a character study - Lewis bringing Plainview to glorious, complex life – and as political commentary. Plainview is clearly America itself, a man made great by his own obsessive hard work and a little bit of luck but also ultimately destroyed by the very same characteristics that made him great. Anderson hangs enormous themes on his lead actor’s shoulders, embodying within him a story of pure capitalism, the rise of the oil economy, social manipulation via religious fervor and ‘family values’, and, finally, the sheer destructive power of pride coupled with insecurity. It’s richly complex stuff, this, subject matter that very few could handle and in Daniel Day Lewis Anderson has found the perfect match for his material.

With his earlier work Anderson came across something like that annoying guy in college. You know, the one who was smarter than you, more talented than you, better looking than you and knew it all. While you couldn’t help but admire his work – and I still consider Magnolia to be very nearly a perfect film – the accusations that Anderson seemed a little bit smug, a little bit style over substance, had the ring of truth to them. With There Will Be Blood, however, the enfant terrible has grown up. The raw talent has been refined, the promise has been realized. Anderson is no longer one of America’s bright young talents, he is no longer one of the great hopes for the future. That future has arrived and Anderson is, quite simply, one of the truly great film makers working today.


At Mubi

3 Comments

user-pic

I think the ending and beginning make perfect parallels to each other. More after thinking about them in hindsight.

As for commercial success and having nothing to relate with I certainly think people can relate with evil oil men. And perhaps might provide fascinating to various audiences for seeing the genesis of the oil industry in its early days taking root. It certainly defies convention in not really having a character to root for and some seriously dark places explored in it, so perhaps more of a cinephile movie than a mainstream one, but I find this particularly refreshing to see a movie get to breath its own life and be its own thing, without being something that gets generalized again and again to broaden its mainstream appeal.

As Anderson noted Upton Sinclair when writing his book went out and studied and saw what we see in the film first hand with burgeoning oil tycoons right next to religious zealots. My how times have changed with each of these powers having bloomed into even further extremes. The film ends right before the book goes into the Hollywood side of the story. Anderson certainly makes the material his own and though a Sinclair story and adaptation it's an Anderson film through and through and a continuation and maturation of many of his themes and footprints. Some great video of Anderson talking on the film at Fantastic Fest hre:
http://texasgeektv.vox.com/library/post/tgtv005-paul-thomas-anderson.html

The film is particularly dense and should be rewarding upon further viewings, not too mention the great score. With Dano in multiple roles and other things that hint at being a secret code, I can't wait to see it some more. I'm also equally impressed the editor of the film did such a great job, despite Anderson throwing in lit firecrackers in the editing room from time to time ;)

user-pic

Blake WROTE:

"The film is particularly dense and should be rewarding upon further viewings, not too mention the great score."

I couldn't agree with this more. Subsequent viewings I'm sure will be very rewarding. The technical aspects of the film are without question, amazing. including the score from Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood.

The lack of story cohesiveness just threw me for a loop. It needed more character development and without trying to ruin things, the dynamic between Daniel and Eli seemed unnecessary and pointless other than an attempt at creating conflict.

Still, again, I can't wait to see it again. I would compare it to Assassination of Jesse James and also No Country for Old Men, except those were amazingly well put together films, where this one has several hiccups.

user-pic

Rather interested to see this. Not sure how you mean regarding a complete turnaround, since I absolutely despise Boogie Nights and Magnolia (probably more than any other film I know), and don't think much of Hard Eight, but felt completely the opposite about Punch Drunk Love. For me that was a 180 degree turn from his previous work, but I guess I'll find out what you're talking about soon enough.

If he is expanding on what he learnt experimenting with his soundtrack and sound design on PDL to this - especially utilising Jonny Greenwood - and you guys are saying it's succcessful, than that makes me all the more intrigued...


Related Posts with Thumbnails