
Jean-Luc Godard has been quoted as saying: "Post-war filmmakers gave us the documentary, Rob Reiner gave us the mockumentary and [Michael] Moore initiated a third genre, the crockumentary." Such a comment, originating from one of the cinema’s arch-leftists, is addressed to a satirist and humorist who is somehow woefully unfunny, unless he is being blown to pieces by Trey Parker. Rob Reiner’s seminal mockumentary, This is Spinal Tap, manipulated the convention of the cinematic essay to remove the pomp and pretension beheld by musicians, in a bid to reclaim the life-affirming qualities of music; it did not do this by hectoring or grandstanding a la Moore, but by making us laugh. The film I wish to focus upon in this review, Babylon’s Fever, created in 2002 and directed by Raphael Frydman, shares these aspirations. This documentary would appear to be so unknown, it is yet to be listed even on the IMDB, and this is why I have longed to bring it to your attention! The subject is the 2001 concert tour of the Parisian singer-songwriter Manu Chajavascript:void(0);
Collapse Extended Texto and his latino-ska ensemble Radio Bemba.
It seems pertinent nowadays that music should again require to be reclaimed. The Live 8 concerts (now migrating across the world in DVD form) frequently disappointed; was Mariah Carey there for anything other than self-promotion? Did Robbie Williams and Pete Doherty attend for reasons other than lechery and debasement? Did St. Bob Geldof really have to sing? Most importantly, did they have any effect on the eight suits that congregated at an Edinburgh hotel? Not at all, and Chao, who demonstrated against those same suits (filled in only rare instances, by different faces) at the Genoa summit in 2001, may well have realised this when he played Live 8 Paris.
There is something discomfiting about musicians who bray quasi-political slogans that do not reflect their attitude to music or humanity – Mariah Carey again. Manu Chao, by contrast, has frequently been compared with Joe Strummer, the incisive and iconic left-wing libertarian frontman of The Clash. Unfortunately Rude Boy (1980), the frenetic film that followed The Clash on tour, too often refused to allow the music and its furious delivery to speak for itself, obfuscating its subject with fictional portrayals of police brutality and racism, and allowing an embarrassingly stoned Strummer struggle to define socialism when a song would have been so much better.
Woodstock (1970), certainly a rockumentary with an ideological stance, bears endless rewatching thanks to the quality of the performances; their lack of pretension, their desire to celebrate their freedom to indulge in music and love. The final scenes witness Hendrix’s comment on Vietnam by guitar, and we can hardly be surprised to discover that Martin Scorsese and Thelma Schoonmaker, two artists who would never allow patronising sententiousness to sully aesthetic integrity, were heavily involved in the editing and assistant direction. Babylon’s Fever appears to borrow heavily from the Scorsese/Schoonmaker alphabet; both from music films The Last Waltz and Bad, and from work such as Raging Bull. This is just as well, although Scorsese’s recent Bob Dylan film was highly accomplished, the talking heads format that transfers us to a prescribed past, inevitably lacks the democratic sentience and visceral impact of the present – the sensation of touring with a band, or being on stage with them.
Chao’s most recent album, Proxima Estacion… Esperanza (Next Station… Hope), and this film’s reference to Babylon appear to describe an indefinite tour; a need to keep moving between and into new and eclectic musical styles and disparate geographical locations in a bid to find the golden chords. Unusually Frydman focuses neither on interviews, nor the band’s live shows, but the manner by which Radio Bemba continue to puruse new musical avenues, even as they are travelling. They simply never stop playing: a table in a trattoria becomes the perfect place for some stomp; we see Manu recording new songs on the tour bus and in what appear to be hastily converted university dorms – he even gives an acoustic performance for the camera in a toilet cubicle; we see the trombonist entranced by the percussive properties of a jar lid, and night after night we witness the band members join huge crowds in fiestas, playing their instruments to them… and enjoying doing it a lot. When they demonstrate against the G8 they unite with the throngs with their instruments and play. Bono is perhaps a worthy recipient of a Nobel Prize nomination, but how often do you see him blending in, sacrificing his remarkable ego for a common end? Perhaps Rattle and Hum (1988) would have been a bit better with a little less portentousness!
Frydman likes his camera to move with them, scrutinizing every, increasingly wearied, face, watching them look out of windows as they traverse yet more space in cars, in the tour bus, on motorbikes. He makes touring look exhausting, and he makes it look terrifying. This is where the Scorsese alphabet comes in: he employs red tints and trails, descends into monochrome and uses any other device that may encourage us to empathise with the performers’ emotions. We begin to feel lost on the tour, uncertain of our location anymore until, finally, we are on a beach, in silence, dawn is breaking, and the lead guitarist informs us: “You’re now in Sardinia”.
Despite being caught up in the journey, Frydman still finds time to obsess about the minutiae, again eschewing the typical rockumentary obsession with egos: we view the routines of the stage personnel, we survey the bands’ rehearsals and warm-ups and we are introduced to the whole armoury of the percussionist; inevitably even this simple task dissolves into a free-form jazz odyssey.
I quote from Spinal Tap there; it is the humour of the director and the band members that truly sets it apart from other rockumentaries. The film opens with two band members greeting director “Rafi” with a song consisting of guitar and catarrh-filled spitting. The clown and undoubted star of Babylon’s Fever however is the band’s Rasta MC Bidji (pictured), France’s real-life answer to Nigel Tufnel. On a plane he muses over the immortal qualities of bottled water – Frydman pans ingeniously to the inscrutable stare of Bidji’s straight man, bassist Gambit throughout – before discovering that they all have best before dates. On another occasion, Bindji seizes the microphone during a sound test and allows us to hear his singing abilities; again Frydman pans to discover Gambit with his fingers in his ears. Seconds later the locals are complaining about the noise he's making. Almost as though they’d walked into Monty Python and the Holy Grail they are ridiculed as only the French can ridicule (“K-nig-hits!”); the citizens leave with a flourish of Gallic shrugs, and we are left thinking back to when Spinal Tap played the Puppet Show and the US Airbase.
In fact, being French, they can barely consume a meal without pursuing some existential issue. Another member of the band, perhaps aping Derek Smalls, claims to be “floating in pure abstraction”.
Nevertheless it is clear that the humour is intentionally and warmly observed by Frydman. There is a whole section of pastiche in which the director interviews Chao as though he were a football coach, “No one is injured,” Manu responds, “And no one has smoked too much.” There then follows a bemusing montage of footballs being kicked at concerts, a five-a-side match, and footage of Bindji playing a football computer game with a friend. Again, can one imagine Coldplay allowing themselves to be portrayed in such an irreverent manner? This film pits pleasure against portent, whilst never detracting from the liberal, post-colonial nature of the music; the genius is that this is not a film about Manu Chao – an emblem of contemporary world music – it is about a troupe of travelling minstrels; it departs from the heady subjectivism of recent American documentaries and exudes the intimate warmth typical of French documentaries, such as Être et Avoir (2002).
The conclusion of the film is truly spectacular. It is not only the end of the tour but the end of Radio Bemba. We truly feel the apprehension amongst the musicians, and the fear of going out into the fray unprepared. Manu borrows from Joe Strummer’s lyrical thesaurus to compare touring to warring; Frydman responds by shooting a short segment of the concert as though it were a scene from Apocalypse Now. The frenzied, dizzying camerawork shot handheld on a smoke-filled stage, inches away from the barnstorming performers, and the rapid, rapacious editing truly convey the sensation of being there on stage, initially in the firing line of an expectant crowd of thousands, then caught in the moment of performance, truly lost in music matured by miles of movement.
If I must criticise this, and other shots of the band performing, it is because the sound quality here seems to be equivalent to that of a Dictaphone. Nevertheless, Babylon’s Fever is only one part of the DVD Babylonia en Guagua, whose primary purpose is to offer us one of the band’s live sets. Unfortunately the incredible performances and virtuoso direction is marred by abysmal structuring and bizarre cuts within the songs. An extra on the DVD, Proxima Estacion… Esperanza, by Heinzi Brandner, probes Manu Chao and his fondness for travel, music and left-wing politics more deeply, and is also well-worth a watch if one has taken a liking to the man, and his unimposing, always inspiring approach.


Heck of an opening line - Godard is nothing if not full of great quotes, that's for sure. Good review, and an interesting sounding music film indeed! I'll keep an eye out for it...
Hi, This is a good article although the only problem I find with it is that the writer did not do his research, seeing as how Manu Chao never played Paris for the Live8 concerts for the simple reasons that are explained at the beginning of the essay. Most of the musicians were there for selfish reasons, their own publicity. On his website he calls it disgusting that the promoters of the concert said that he would play when he himself never had any intention of playing live8 Paris. A few weeks ago he was in south america playing after a Chavez said a few things in the anti-bush speech in south america. Although The author does make a great commentary on the documentary.
I searched high and low for Manu's Live 8 performance (well we weren't gonna see it in England were we?) because I thought something was amiss... it wasn't part of the piece I wrote confidently! I am all the more devoted to Chao and Radio Bemba following Jonathan's revelation. Of course, as you will see the internet still states that Manu performed... to hear his name mentioned with Chavez makes a lot of sense.
Bye! :)
I have to say that i bought a couple of months ago Babylon's fever, and it's an excellent dvd, a must own by Manu Chao fans, the review posted on this page on the documentary , simply nails it. Alltough, it is a fact tha Manu Chao did not play Live 8 Paris, as inform by himself on Manu's official web site, not a surprise, given his known ideology and convictions. The other documentary included on the dvd called "infinita tristeza" with Manu Chao, Madjid, Gambit and Gianny playing in the town teather of a Zapatista community.
yes, good review from a film point of view. Nice follow up on the live 8... your point of how the film reinforces manu's point of "tour is war" is well taken. also, look inside the "radio bemba sound system" liner notes to see just how much they were touring from 2000-2002. An 11 piece band in many continents and countries... it's impressive.
However, the politics of Manu are so dense and real that it is truly a task to do them justice in a film or in a single article. I look for the day when there might be a documentary on his life. There is recently a book out in either spanish or italian titled Manu Chao, but not being a native speaker, i have not picked it up and cant vouch for its content... But at 46, he has alot of time left.
Anyhow, so much of Manu and Radio Bemba is to and for the people, not for himself. "Que paso par la calle?" is the anthem from Mano Negra days that still lives on. The scenes from the street in the film illustrate this. I know that, on at least one occasion, members of the band have been arrested for playing in the streets after shows! I recently saw him in south america and have been very involved in following this tour though i only saw 1 date, Santiago. I have gathered that Manu played at least as many free dates on the tour as he did actual shows. Shows in Cuba, Mexico and Venezuela were free... that i know of. I'm sure that he informally played many more free shows that scheduled shows. He purposely goes into the barrios and plays for people that might not have the chance to see him other wise. He did this in Santiago the day before the show i saw. At the last show in Mexico City, it is estimated 180,000 people were on hand for the free, open-air show! In Venezuela, the crowd rushed the gates and so he played a second night for free to make up.
This is clearly not about himself or about money. He is a self proclaimed "musical journalist." He is quoted as saying that he had to go to Bolivia on this latest tour because he wanted to see how things were evolving after Morales had taken office. I cant imagine that he charged for shows in Bolivia. Or if he did, how much can you really stand to gain in Bolivia? Who tours in Bolivia from Europe? His stance is clearly with indigenous peoples of the world. He is touring to check up on the people and situations more than anything and let his presence bring a rally for attention and action.
It's also fascinating to have a look at "Mano Negra en Colombia. Un tren de hielo y fuego" (originally in french by Manu's Father:"Un train de glace et de feu") a book about when mano negra had their own train in columbia. Everyone who came to the show was armed. But people were joining the tour as the train went, the positive force of the music was so compelling. This is his goal. In a very real way, for a huge part of the world (highly unknown to many "americans"), manu and his music really are proxima estacion, esperanza!
Some other notes: Manu dedicated Clandestino to several groups, including the EZLN, (or Zapatista Army of National Liberation). Proceeds from Mano Negra’s Best Of CD (released last year), go to Enlace Civil, a human rights organization based in Chiapas—EZLN’s base of operations in southern Mexico. He was also active last fall at the summit of the americas.
I obviously cant do full justice to his politics here, but only add the flavor touched upon by the film and the commentary at this web page. It's all truly fascinating. And one must seriously look at the success Manu has had with his approach. It's undeniable and tremebdously grass roots. The fact that it is his life work in politics is inseperable from his art and is fairly unique in the modern global music culture. Frankly, it's inspiring.
But beyond politics, I think part of the humor that you find in the documentary is part of what has always been Manu, since Mano Negra. (Songs about Diego Maradona with the chorous "Futbol, Futbol, Futbol!") Without the humor, the whole thing is dead. And the humor is very humanistic, it's not contrived in anyway. This is of the essence of Manu Chao and it truly permeates the film and the band. It makes you want to just hang out with these guys!! But this is also part of why i think his approach to politics has been so well recieved. He has plenty of humor, but there is also a time to be serious.
Did we mention the music? I think it goes with out saying, unbelievable.
-----