
Five minutes into Caché you are still looking at the same unobtrusive city street in a upscale treed neighborhood. The credits crawl across the screen one letter at a time. Why does this feel ominous and forboding, when nothing is actually happening yet? Well that is because you are in the latest Michael Haneke (The Piano Teacher, Time of the Wolf) film, and that is what Haneke does best.
Georges (Daniel Auteuil), his wife Anne (Juliette Binoche) and their son Pierrot (Lester Makedonsky) live happy and are well provided for. They are upper middle-class French liberals who have a house decorated almost entirely with books, and dinner parties with lots of wine and witty French intellectual friends. Georges remarks at one point to his mother that things are well. Even if there are no highs, there are no lows either. The family begins to receive a series of anonymous video tapes dropped off at their front doorstep. On the tapes are images of their house. Nothing is happening (the opening shot of the film) but it is creepy to have someone filming you. They go to the police, but the police won't do anything until something actually happens. When a video of Georges' old family home shows up, things get even creepier. First, because the voyeur seems to know something of Georges past and second, because the tape is wrapped in a sheet of paper with a crayon drawing of a face with a smear of red. Georges begins havnig unsettling and violent dreams of himself as a boy witnessing another boy cutting the head off of a chicken. Anne begins to get on edge, not just from the video terrorism, but also because Georges seems to be unwilling to talk with her on the subject. The strain on their formerly bump-less marriage is palpable.
Over the course of its two-hour runtime, Caché, using Haneke's effective minimalist narrative approach, deals with issues of responsibility, trust, honesty, guilt, blame, terrorism and racism. All of these are shown as personal, but the subtext swims in these issues in the collective cultural sense. It is a savage attack on the archetypical French liberal bourgeois. The film brings a form of terror right to the doorstep in a scene, where Georges and Anne cannot find their son one evening. While their panic rises, on a TV in the background between them, there is news footage of some sort of vague middle-eastern violence with people and children covered in blood. The strain of terror on normal people is transformative and ugly. That most of the impending fear in the film is delivered through means of mass communication, the video and television medium specifically, is a fascinating subject. And Haneke gives it a thorough look, even as we watch from a distant vantage point. A point which is underscored by the final extended shot of the film.
Caché succeeds brilliantly because it manages to keep you on the edge in perpetual apprehension and dread, watching normal folks go about their mundane daily lives with an aura of fear layered over everything. The 9/11 allusions here are impossible to miss. In fact, this is likely the best 9/11 film since Spike Lee's The 25th Hour. Casual and vindictive acts commited in the past, for whatever reason (or even lack-thereof) come home to roost on Georges, not unlike events with America and the Middle East. Make no mistake though, this isn't some first year college diatribe on the global political climate. Haneke is equally interested in the characters in this film, particularly Georges transformation of disconnected, aloof liberal to vindictive and harsh conservative. It is a complex transformation and to get into it would involve a lot of spoilers, so suffice it to say, there is a brilliant performance from Daniel Auteuil. Juliette Binoche is relegated to very much a supporting role, but she brings a lot to the table as a woman consumed with fear and feeling any bonds of marriage being stripped away from lack of communication.
There is violence in Caché (one act caused several members in the audience to shriek in horror) and it is abrupt and chilling, not unlike an act of modern terrorism.


I am totally Haneke's bitch and was very bummed that I couldn't make it to his new one. Now I have to wait three years for the DVD ... sigh
This movie is an incredilble dog.
I agree with the review, that it provides excellent characterizations within the contest of a particular culture however I would add two points.
A: After the opening scene I believe the viewer is able to "get the picture&" of quiet dread. The technique of holding the picture, to me, was over used.
B: Walking out of the theater many people asked "Did you understand what the film was about?&" I certainly have an opinion and the review misses, again I believe, the specter of the younger son and his anger set within the context of parents who live their lives in a paint by number manner. I half expected the last scene to include the two sons exiting from the school. Enough said.
I did not see the two sons in the final scene, but one of my companions said they did. I have my doubts because if something so important happens at that point and most people miss it, Haneke has made an error in making it difficult to spot.
I agree that this was an extraordinary film.
If anyone is still reading this . . . I saw the film tonight and the two sons indeed are having a converstation at the bottom of the stairs of the school. They also appear to be getting along well. I've read a few reviews that call this scene "ominous&" but I found it somewhat optimistic in that is shows the road to tolerance lies with the youth. Great film.
High Monkey Monk:
That is certainly a fresh (and un-Haneke-ean) way of looking at things. I rather like that take on things. Now that you are first-hand confirming it, I'll certainly be looking for it when I watch the film again.
The two sons are in the final scene, bottom left. The ALgerian son exits camera right, Pierrot goes up the steps to join friends
I analyzed the last scene on my site here and, after emailing some film critics, here, with screen shots.
I am actually very surprised that people missed the two sons talking, since it went on for about two minutes.
If you're rewatching the movie, you might also want to pay attention to the swim coach (which I discuss in my posts above).
The movie's intepretation is somewhat ambiguous, but it's nowhere near as ambiguous as a lot of people seem to think.
Yes, it was quite easy to see the two sons chatting in the bottom left. My friend & I noticed them without having read any prior reviews.
Terrific movie.
Pierrot planted the tapes.
The last tape is delivered in the middle of the night, when they're having dinner with friends.
Doorbell rings, father opens 1st door, opens 2nd door, stands outside a little while shouting, closes the outer door, but when he tries shutting the first, it jams. Only then does he notice the packaged tape.
It's highly unlikely that he would miss the plastic bag with contents the first time around. And that 1st door really was close, until the package is planted in the door opening.
-----