Breathless

Rumors

DRAGON DYNASTY To Release HARD BOILED On Blu-ray By Christmas?

by J Hurtado, September 4, 2010 9:28 PM


Dragon Dynasty, the Asian specialty imprint that hardcore kung fu aficionados can't decide if they want to kiss or kill, may be getting ready to drop one of the most popular movies in their vast catalog, Hard Boiled, on Blu-ray by Christmas.  I don't yet have confirmation on this, however, if true, this could be an awesome way to end the year.  DD released Hard Boiled on DVD a couple of years ago, and was simultaneously cheered by the casual Asian action fan and chastised by the hardcore film geek* contingent.  The problem?  Dubtitles.  Much of our readership understands this phenomenon from years of importing and bootlegging hard to find Hong Kong action films, but for the rest of you, I'll give a brief description.

When a non-English language film is prepared for distribution in English speaking territories, often an English language dub is prepared to cater to a broader audience that might not want to read subtitles.  This is an abhorrent practice to many film fans, but hey, if it gets more people watching better movies, it can't be all bad.  The main problem is that often, for pacing reasons and simplicity's sake, the original dialogue is not directly translated and many of the nuances of the original script are lost for convenience's sake.  Usually when it comes time to release that film on home video, the DVD publisher will furnish the dub as well as the original language track with subtitles following the original dialogue.  However, in many cases the subtitles will follow the English language dub rather than the original dialogue; hence, dubtitles.

Dragon Dynasty's Hard Boiled was such a title.  There has been considerable backlash among the film geek* community, and hopefully, if this title is indeed coming to Blu-ray in December, they will address the issue.  The picture on the old disc was great and there were some pretty cool extras, but that one little thing sparked conniption fits across the country on internet forum after internet forum.  Since the film geek community is their main demographic, and they hardest to please, let's hope Dragon Dynasty does us right this time around.

Then again, this may not happen.

My fingers are crossed, though!  Roll on Hard Boiled Blu-ray!

Look for it sometime around December 14.

* Despite my earlier insistence that my language was not intended to offend, I managed to offend.  So I softened the language a little bit.  Many apologies to those who may have felt I was condescending or dismissive, no such insult was intended.





At Mubi

49 Comments

user-pic

This has nothing to do with being in the "nerd" community, is about demanding a fair product for our money. Considering the awful job DD is doing with their BR releases it's safe to say that HB will be another victim of the weinstein's hack machine. So no, there's no need to made up my mind here, until DD starts respecting their customers i'm not wasting my money on their sub-par products.

user-pic

Their treatment of recent films has been pretty good, it is the catalog titles I think we need to be concerned about. TItles like Fist of Legend, The Legend, The Killer, Tai Chi Master, 36th Chamber, are all plagued with their own issues. Sometimes it is dubtitles, sometimes it is using the ridiculous Miramax cuts of the movies, at first it was interlacing. I'm not one to support anyone blindly, but I really hope they can do this one well. In my opinion, if there was ever a time to pay attention to the consumer and prove that you have their best interests in mind, this is it.

user-pic

That "great" HARD BOILED DVD wasn't even the right shape - the picture was cropped and stretched out noticeably in addition to not being translated correctly. But other than it being incompetently made, it's awesome.

user-pic

That sure was an awesome DVD, with the dubtitles and the cropped and stretched out picture. It was so awesome I don't particularly feel the need to hand the same assholes more money for a Blu-ray that's probably just another blurry PAL conversion. Really, I'm just waiting for that damn company to fold.

user-pic

"Nerd Community"?
F++k you!

user-pic

Temper, Cuttermaran...

"Nerd" wasn't used as an insult here, in fact I haven't heard it being used as an insult anymore for decades. Probably a side-effect of the "Revenge of the Nerd" movies and AICN's pimping of the word along with geek. I think even "fan" has creepier annotations these days.

Want to get mad at the word "nerd"? Fine, that's your choice. But please do it in private and refrain from returning a worse insult (as an aside: I don't give a FUCK whether or not anyone uses ++, it counts as the same thing).

user-pic

Wow, a reaction. I think that condemning Dragon Dynasty out of hand is a bit hasty. Their track record is certainly spotty, but they have done some really good releases. There is the possibility that they'll take the criticism's of the first DVD, which were plentiful, and adjust accordingly. Granted, they screwed up The Killer and 36th Chamber, but their Blu-ray releases since then have been mostly pretty decent. I, too, want them to do right by this movie, it is one of my all-time favorite movies. Hence the very last line in the article, which some will undoubtedly fail to read.

user-pic

For every good release there are two done wrong. For every decent release where they didn't fuck up anything they release another dvd with a cut movie, with dub-titles, without the proper language tracks, with bad prints, with awful covers. I also hope DD just dissapears and a company who actually cares about movies and customers re-releases all this stuff with the proper care and attention.

user-pic

The problem with DD disappearing is that whatever would replace them would undoubtedly have only a fraction of the resources that Vivendi has at their disposal. Because of that, their best intentions may remain wasted. I think that the best and ideal solution is for Dragon Dynasty to step up and bring some people on board who understand the concerns an have the ability to address them. How many bad prints are in the collection? Most of the comparisons I've seen show DD at or above the best in the market on image quality. I will agree that their covers are hokey, and not particularly creative. I am, however, grateful, that for the most part they've ditched the celebrity hosted extra on their newer releases. I don't really need to know what Brett Ratner or The RZA thought of a movie.

user-pic

They have yet to release a good BR so far. Also, RZA do knows about his kung fu movies, Bret Hackner is the one who has no place in audio commentaries of kung fu movies.

user-pic

This is just blatantly untrue. The Protector, Invisible Target, Princess and the Warriors. Pretty much all of the discs of recentish films are great.

user-pic

I frequently see companies with a fraction of the resources do better work than Dragon Dynasty. Discotek comes immediately to mind. So does Well Go. So does Media Blasters. So does Viz. So do several of the more prominent bootleggers, for chrissakes. At least tiny little Discotek will send back a substandard transfer to the studio it came from and ask them to try harder next time, instead of just lying to their customers on Facebook about the quality of the transfer like Dragon Dynasty did with THE KILLER. Dragon Dynasty sucks balls. If they get something right it's because they were too lazy to screw it up.

user-pic

Discotek doesn't have access to Miramax's catalog. I'm a huge fan of Discotek, but they have a niche, and it isn't the same as Dragon Dynasty.

user-pic

Neither does the Weinstein Company.

user-pic

Well-written piece, Josh. Thanks for the info.

Yeah, DD is a weird company to follow - I mean, they release films I admire or have long wanted to see but in ways that tend to diminish the original work in some way. Case in point: Fist of Legend is my all-time favorite martial arts film* and the Blu Ray was a day 1 purchase for me. I'm not even sure where to begin with the poor quality on the release.

It seems like somewhere along the line their resources don't meet their passion for the genre or their understanding of what made a film work is out of sync with the audience, which is typically frustrating to mind-boggling. Still, like Josh asked, who would replace them if they didn't exist?

*You wanna make somethin' of it?!

user-pic

They hate their customers, absolutely hold them in contempt. They want to drive away the should-be loyal customers they've got and hate in favor of pursuing the mainstream customers they love but are never going to get. It's absolutely moronic. Then again, moronic is their MO. See also their habit of stealing the titles of existing films (and video games in the case of KILL ZONE) to retitle Asian movies. Once is a coincidence. Twice is a bigger coincidence. Over and over again is a habit.

user-pic

Cine Asia have started releasing DD discs here in the UK, and so far I've had no problem with the quality of the discs. Invisible Target is a personal favourite. I just wish they wouldn't change the titles. What the hell does Kill Zone even MEAN?

user-pic

Also, can you think of a specific example of Dragon Dynasty actually taking advantage of their extensive resources to do something to improve the release of a film in a way that a smaller company couldn't have done equally well if not even better? Because I can't.


They've occasionally used those resources for ill (I wonder how much that re-edit of TOM YUM GOONG cost) but never for good. Such awe-inspiring resources surely could have summoned up a 1080p24 transfer of 36TH CHAMBER OF SHAOLIN (such as the one on the French Blu-ray) as opposed to the 25fps to 30fps converted garbage they passed off onto us. At the very least you'd think they could tap those resources to get someone to retranslate the subtitles on these films. Surely that's not beyond their capabilities - smaller companies with no resources seem able to do it all the time.


Looking at the Hong Kong titles Discotek has released, I fail to see how their releases of titles like STORM RIDERS, TAXI HUNTER, and BURNING PARADISE are in a different niche from Dragon Dynasty's usual offerings. I mean, other than Discotek actually putting a decent amount of care and effort into their releases.

user-pic

The Tom Yum Goong cut was done by the foreign sales agent - TF1 - not the Weinsteins. Doesn't make it any better, but hate where it's due on that one. All of the Jaa recuts have been done before they arrived on US shores, actually.

user-pic

I wholeheartedly agree that the international cut was a complete trainwreck. Like many of you, I imported the disc as soon as it was available from Korea in its longer unadulterated version. It is no masterpiece, but there is a plot, and there is some attempt at character development. When I went to see it theatrically here, to add my $6 support to its domestic box office, I came out confused. They chopped huge chucks out and the story made no sense anymore. I do not condone thsi kind of cutting. However, in the interest of the consumer Dragon Dynasty, to their credit, deliver both cuts of the film, in HD no less, when they were under absolutely no requirement to do so, the majority of the buying public would have no idea about the difference. I give them credit on that one.

user-pic

So it was TF1 who hired The RZA to rescore it, and renamed it after an 80s Jackie Chan movie? (I realize it might read as such, but this isn't sarcasm. I thought that TOM YUM GOONG's recut was 100% Weinstein - unlike the ONG BAK and ONG BAK 2 rescore/recuts which are the fault of the European distributor. Who did what here?)

user-pic

Hmm ... just went and did some digging and it looks like I have to retract some of that. The Thai version of the film is 108 minutes. The version TF1 lists for international sale is 94 minutes, that's their international cut. The version released in Germany was further cut to 90 minutes. And the US version all the way down to 81 minutes. So TF1 did cut it and then the Weinsteins went and cut it more. I hadn't realized as I've never seen their version. Hate away!

user-pic

@ Todd Brown - DD's version of Protector is actually their own unique cut. The European edit was actually cut for violence while DD's retains the violence but was further cut for "better pacing".

user-pic

I prefer to think of it as love for the films rather than hate for the company that abuses them. I'd love nothing more than for this outfit to get its shit together and finally live up to its own self-adoration. They had the potential to be the Criterion Collection of Asian cinema* - it saddens me greatly to think of all that squandered potential, to think of what could have been but was lost to laziness and indifference.




*God knows Criterion wasn't interested in the job.

user-pic

That, sir, is an excellent distinction to make.

user-pic

Well said Rhythm-X, I totally agree with you on that one.
If we had a "quotes-of-the-week" section, your comment would've been in it!

user-pic

hey had the potential to be the Criterion Collection of Asian cinema

maybe if they had got someone other than Logan and White to run it -- DD turned out pretty much as I would've expected from that + the Weinsteins

no idea who's running the ship there now, but at least the Weinstein legacy is intact

user-pic

The only problem I see with Bey Logan is that perhaps he has a mildly inflated sense of his own importance. Hong Kong Legends, under his watch, is responsible for some of the best treatments of these films we have available, including the best English friendly version of this very film.

user-pic

HKL under Logan was basically at the same level as DD under Logan, the big difference is that HKL actually improved after Logan (and White) left and DD has gotten worse

and sorry, but Logan's sucking up to the Weinsteins (he defended their recuts even when he was at HKL) is basically a crime against cinema in my book

user-pic

(also my other, smaller objection is that Logan's tastes are pretty obviously narrow; if Criterion's tastes are geographically constrained -- no African cinema, no South American cinema, few non-Japanese Asian films -- their tastes within that area are rather more catholic, whereas it's a dead certainty that DD aren't going to do anything with those Ann Hui titles, or even No Mercy for the Rude which they apparently allowed to lapse)

user-pic

I wanted to correct myself, the version of Hard Boiled I'm referencing is from Tartan, HKL did The Killer.

user-pic

Tartan did a couple of releases in the UK - one cut (by a couple of seconds, for violence), and then an uncut one with no extras. They claimed it meant they 'filled' the DVD with all movie data (I'm not so technical on these things, so excuse the rubbish description) rather than a crapper image and loads of extras. Anyhow, it was remastered from a decent 35mm print and is pretty good - best I've seen over here. Blu-ray would be awesome though...

user-pic

God knows Criterion wasn't interested in the job."
--
As for that statement I believe that Criterion lost the rights to both The Killer & Hard Boiled as well as to many of their titles that they originally put out as Special Edition Laserdiscs. When Criterion first started doing their thing DVD was still being developed & for a while everybody believed that they next thing would be VOD for all movies (which well all now is still being figured out). When DVD became available Criterion found out the very hard way that they did not have the legal right to distribute a large number of titles in their catalogue on DVD. They lost a lot of titles & money as a result. The studios did not want to pay for all the extras that Criterion produced & Criterion was certainly not going to give them away for free. Hence the many inferior DVD editions in the early years of DVD. Since then the studios have "worked" with Criterion and now you can get many of those films with all of those superior extras that set Criterion apart from the rest. Unfortunately DD has not yet worked with Criterion for some unknown reason (greed probably) on The Killer & Hard Boiled. All I can say is thank God I still have my Criterion Laserdiscs of those two movies both of which are autographed by both their director & star. Instead of throwing a fit I just simply burned DVD copies of my Laserdiscs & will enjoy those until somebody gives in & puts out REAL collector's editions.

user-pic

I'm going to assume that no one can think of an instance where the Weinstein Company's (or Vivendi's) vast resources have led to any increase in the quality of a Dragon Dynasty release.

user-pic

their Shaw titles are usually proper NTSC and not PAL-to-NTSC like the IVLs -- DD are clearly using the Celestial masters so I don't understand why the IVLs had the issue in the first place

user-pic

(also I don't think I need to add that the Shaw BDs are excluded)

user-pic

DD's products are hit or miss. U got great releases like SPL: Kill Zone and City of Violence. And then bad ones like The Enforcer and The Killer. Im just glad that theyve finally jumped on the HD bandwagon and the news of Hard Boiled coming to Blu is music to my ears. Lets just hope they do a good job with it.

I just wanna address the "cropping" "stretching" of DD's transfers, particularly Hard-Boiled. I sent Bey Logan a personal email many months (possibly years) ago about DD's transfers. I asked "HKL boasted on their front covers 'RESTORED & REMASTERED'. Did HKL actually do their own restorations? Does DD do their own restorations?" His response (I'm paraphrasing) "Yes, aside from the Fortune Star titles, HKL did all thier own restorations. DD has never done their own restorations." So in the end, Hard-Boiled's "cropped" "stretched" "dicked up" transfer was never their fault. It turns out the transfer found on DD's disc is the same one found on the R2 Scandinavian DVD that came out 1 year or so earlier. Ive seen the screencaps and sure enuff, theyre identical.

Sadly, this also explains why their formerly Miramax-owned titles like Fist of Legend, Fong Sai Yuk and Supercop remain cut. Rather than making an effort to track down and license fully uncut prints, they cut corners and resort to using preexisting masters they already own. Quite a shame. :(

user-pic

Just further proof of how little they care about the consumer and the product.

user-pic

Okay, this thread has reached its saturation point for me. Boring. I'll attempt to conclude by saying that I am cautiously optimistic.

Gawd have you got that right!

user-pic

I avoid this kind of shit by watching 99% of my foreign films via torrents. Bring on the hate, but I find even fan-subs are better than the white washed crap you get on a 30$ DVD.

user-pic

It's not a good thing (and really, you should import whenever possible)... but it's symptomatic. When what you buy in stores is frequently of inferior quality to what you can illegally download from the internet for free, it's not surprising that "free & quite good" often wins over "costs money & sucks".

user-pic

This is a saner reaction. I agree with this. How you prefer to think of it, however, has not come across in the tone of your responses. Dragon Dynasty has put together a few decent releases, and in their earlier days, before Blu-ray, the percentage of good v. bad releases was much higher. I agree that they need could put more effort in, however, I have a problem with the sense of entitlement a lot of people have.

user-pic

"sense of entitlement"


The real sense of entitlement seems to be on the part of the company that thinks the proper customer reaction to lazy, half-assed efforts is undying gratitude.

user-pic

I see your point. In fact, I've agreed with you several times. However, I don't see DD asking for "undying gratitude". They want your money, like any good company. They've cut a lot of corners with beloved movies, and that is unacceptable, which was the point of my original post, though it seems like that is forgotten among all of the back and forth on this thread. You are wrong, it is the consumers, in this case, who feel entitled, and perhaps rightfully so, perhaps not. I'm no corporate shill. I'm just a little better at separating my own emotions from reality.

user-pic

Oh, and they are releasing Robin-B-Hood (yes an unnecessary re-title) on Blu-ray in November. It being a contemporary release, it should be fine. It probably won't have the extended cut, but it should have the original HK theatrical cut.

user-pic

Re-title justified IMO. "Rob-B-Hood"? Is that supposed to sound clever or funny? No, it makes no sense and sounds really dumb and obscure. "Robin-B-Hood" sounds no better and is equally dumb and obscure but alteast the average consumer will recognize the words "Robin" and "Hood" and come to their own conclusion of what the movie might be about. I couldve came up with a better title: "Rock-A-Baby". YEAH!!! LOL.


UK Blu-ray and DVD of Robin-B-Hood are reportedly cropped from 2.35 to 1.78 so hopefully DD's forthcoming release can correct that.

user-pic

"equally dumb and obscure"


Indeed, both titles are equally horrible.


"so hopefully DD's forthcoming release can correct that."


ROB-B-HOOD is apparently a Super 35 format film, so it's possible that the 16:9 framing for the UK DVD/Blu-ray is the filmmakers' preference and not actually an error at all. Unlikely, but possible. The US Dragon Dynasty DVD seems to have been presented in the correct 2.35:1 aspect ratio, so I'm curious as to what the US Blu-ray looks like.

user-pic

same goes for The Banquet or Curse of the Golden Scorpion or whatever -- UK and French BDs (La Légende du scorpion noir lol) are cropped, but the U.S. DVD was proper 'Scope


Leave a comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails