Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring Again

Twitch O Meter

Masters In Decline

by Todd Brown, March 17, 2009 7:04 AM


When we first came up with the idea of doing these regular Twitch-O-Meter posts the only limitations given were that the posts had to be some sort of list. At the time I thought that would lead to a pretty broad range of approaches, which is has in a way, but there is one overwhelming similarity between the huge majority of them: Almost all are lists of favorites of one sort or another. So today I'm doing something different.

With this edition of the Twitch-O-Meter we look at the fallen masters, a list of five film makers who at their peaks were considered the very best at what they did. They have all changed the way films are made and at one point were among the most sought after film makers in the world, their names in the credits a virtual guarantee of quality. And then all of them - for some reason or another - descended into mediocrity or worse. The goal here isn't to mock or to poke fun but instead to remember what made them great in the first place, to wonder aloud what went wrong and, maybe, to serve as a hopeful note that they can somehow find their way back to their creative peaks.

You'll find all five below the break, organized alphabetically.

Dario Argento
If I'm being honest Dario Argento was the very first name that leapt to mind when I first considered this as a possible topic, not just because he is such a prime example of the phenomenon but also because his recent attempts to push back into mainstream awareness have failed so badly.

At his peak Argento was arguably the most important horror film maker in the world and remains one of the most influential. Incredibly prolific as a writer in his early career Argento became a household name as a director thanks to enduring classics such as Suspiria, Tenebre and Profondo Rosso while - as a producer - he was hugely important in George Romero's rise to international prominence. And then it all went wrong with a string of substandard releases whittling away all but the core fans with even those having a progressively harder time getting excited about each subsequent release.

What went wrong? The general collapse of the Italian film industry certainly couldn't have helped but Argento seems to have been, as much as anything, a victim to his own ego and a blind faith in his own genius. Argento's general view of the world came into painfully clear view for those of us here in Toronto when he publicly accused the Toronto International Film Festival of racism for placing Mother Of Tears in the Midnight Madness program rather than in the main competition, completely disregarding the fact that acceptance in the a-list festival had just breathed new life into his career and that Toronto does not have a competitive program of any sort and never has. These days he's better known as the father of Asia than as the creator of his own work, which is a sad, sad situation.

Why He'll Always Matter: Suspiria.


John Carpenter
Everything you need to know about John Carpenter can be summed up this way. One ten year stretch of Carpenter's career produced Assault On Precinct 13, Halloween, The Fog, Escape From New York, The Thing, Christine, Starman and Big Trouble In Little China - an incredible run of iconic and diverse films. Now compare that list to his five most recent theatrical releases: Ghosts of Mars, Vampires, Escape From LA, Village of the Damned and In The Mouth Of Madness.

Now, I realize that Mouth has a good number of fans out there and I myself am one of the relative few that actually really enjoys Escape From LA - which I happily paid to see in the theater - but nobody could ever suggest that latter-day Carpenter holds a candle to his peak period.

There are two basic positions on what happened with Carpenter. One theory is that he simply got bored and became content to go through the motions and coast on his own name. The other - and the one I tend to lean towards - is that Carpenter was very much a product of his time and has failed to keep up with his changing audience and the changing culture around him. Other than a couple Masters of Horror episodes Carpenter has been on an extended hiatus for years now and with three new projects announced we can only hope that the rest has done him good.

Why He'll Always Matter: Depending on your mood, Halloween, The Thing, Escape From New York and Big Trouble In Little China are all bona fide classics.


John McTiernan
If you, like me, are a child of the seventies who hit adolesence in the mid-1980s then John McTiernan's inclusion in this list should require no explanation. At a time when action directors were disposable and interchangable, McTiernan was - for a three film stretch - just short of a god, the only true action film auteur of his time.

First came Predator, the beefiest of all the 1980s beefcake action films, and also one of the most enduring. Then came Die Hard, the film that snapped the world out of the beefcake action mode by introducing a believably realistic anti-hero, made a HUGE star of Bruce Willis and remains an enduring holiday classic. And then came The Hunt For Red October, the film that proved McTiernan was a real, live grown up director capable of working with serious actors to create a taught thriller that parents could enjoy just as much as their pimply-faced kids.

Hunt came in 1990 and since that time McTiernan has produced one other trio of solidly b-fare - the remake of The Thomas Crown Affair is his best work in that period - along with a fistful of Razzie-nominated pictures. Legal troubles - he did time recently in an illegal wiretap case - have taken a bite out of McTiernan's career but mostly he just seems to have lost the taste, instincts and confidence that made his prime work so iconic.

Why He'll Always Matter: Die Hard. It'll never get old.


Tsui Hark
An incredibly prolific producer - fifty seven credits listed in the IMDB - and director - forty five of those - not to mention writer (37), actor (22) and editor (4), Tsui Hark is arguably the most important figure in the 1980s Golden Era, a seemingly omnipresent force, his name on the credits a virtual guarantee of quality. For many of those years, Tsui made a potent pairing with John Woo with the two collaborating on a number of pictures.

Whether on his own or working collaboratively Tsui was a major force pushing Hong Kong cinema forward to new levels of action and technical acheivement, the man a major player in the post-Shaw era when the industry was struggling to redefine itself, find new stars and a new place in the international market place. Tsui did all of that and more, his films - particularly titles like The Blade and the Once Upon A Time In China films - making a huge impact around the globe.

And then came the move to Hollywood.

With the handover of Hong Kong back to Chinese control looming, Tsui - like many of Hong Kong's key players - tried to make the transition away from Hong Kong and into Hollywood and the results were - to put it kindly - less than satisfactory. Double Team and Knock Off failed both critically and commercially and whiel Tsui's return to Hong Kong cinema - Time and Tide - was somethng of a return to form it was clear that the bloom had come off this particular rose.

Output since has been spotty, ranging from middling fare such as Seven Swords to critical failures (Missing, Black Mask 2) and one very messy anthology contribution - his segment of three part puzzle film Triangle was subjected to significant recutting after being slammed in Cannes - but Tsui is still by far the most prolific of the directors of this list, the most willing to experiment and adapt and therefore also the most likely to rebound.

Why He'll Always Matter: Once Upon A Time In China


Wim Wenders
While discussing this list with a friend last night - one of the most prominent film critics in print here in Toronto - I mentioned that I was considering giving a spot to Germany's Wim Wenders and the reaction was immediate. In his opinion you could make the argument that no currently active film maker has seen their skills erode as badly and as quickly as Wenders.

Once the darling of the international art house thanks to the one-two punch of Paris, Texas and Wings Of Desire it has been a long slide into obscurity for Wenders. His last film to achieve significant positive notice being 1999's music doc Buence Vista Social Club, a film that seemed ready to push Wenders to new levels of commercial acceptance until he made the critical mistake of following it with the critically despised Million Dollar Hotel, a film penned by U2's Bono that came out so badly that even its star - Mel Gibson - openly took shots at it for being boring while on the press tour.

Million Dollar Hotel failed so badly that it essentially marked the end of any commercial aspirations Wenders may have had - he has never since had a film released on any sort of wide scale despite remaining busy on a number of projects ever since. And, honestly, that wouldn't really have bothered fans if the end of commercially-minded Wenders had meant a return to the form that produced his greatest works but that hasn't happened either. His presence on the festival circuit has declined with every successive release, as has critical response and excitement.

Why He'll Always Matter: Wings Of Desire


28 Comments

user-pic

Great list Todd and I totally agree on all of those, except maybe Wenders since I haven't seen any of his films, just scenes from Wings of Desire and I have Paris Texas sitting on the shelve, just never popped it in.

user-pic

John Carpenter's decline has always puzzled me. Who directs "The Thing" and then "Escape from LA" (sorry)? Another theory that should be investigated... was Carpenter abducted by akins and replaced with a sub-par copy?

user-pic

Nice list. I have some pet theories about all this that I'll now share. I know you didn't ask,*but who cares.*

Argento: At some point, all of the following happened: he lost Goblin, had a marriage dissolve, failed to realize that his films had no narrative cohesion and failed to make sense, and couldn't keep up with the times.

John Carpenter: The secret fuel for a lot of his angst was the Me Decade's betrayal of 60's idealism, and the horrifying onset of the Reagan Era. Once those years were over, so was he.

Finally: No Tobe Hooper?!? What the hell?

user-pic

CIGARETTE BURNS was outstanding, if you haven't seen it - but it was the first thing Carpenter had done in years that made me sit up and take notice. Here's hoping we see something good from him again.

I've all but given up on Argento. Early stuff from GIALLO looks pretty terrible.

Although his career hasn't spanned as long as the others, I'm starting to worry about Hideo Nakata. THE RING 2, KAIDAN, L (seems to be some love for it, but not from me)... ugh. How long before a streak becomes the rule and not a freak thing???

It is absolutely possible to pull yourself back up from such doldrums - look at Paul Verhoven with BLACK BOOK after a decade of mediocrity, or Gus Van Sant pulling a total 180 after PSYCHO (a career killer by all rights) and FINDING FORRESTER.

user-pic

i would have added John Woo in there (Paycheck, ugh! MI2, ugh!). but although i don't think Red Cliff is all that great compared to his earlier films, it did do great at the box-office. so i guess Mr Woo can consider himself salvaged.

user-pic

Tobe Hooper's Salem's Lot mini-series was great too.

user-pic

Well yes, and Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is great too (in a satire way i mean) but how could you explain his later work? (Mortuary, Crocodile, etc.) It's just plain awful.

user-pic

Sam Raimi should be in that list.

user-pic

William Friedkin?

After the double-whammy of "The Exorcist" and "The French Connection" it was hard to stay THAT good consistently, but his output of the last twenty years was very disappointing.
Even "To Live and Die in LA" was very pulpy compared to his earlier movies.

Bug was kinda good though, maybe he isn't lost to us yet...

user-pic

Should Raimi be on that list? Or should that be a different list of 'directors defanged by the Hollywood system?'

I give you that Spiderman 3 in particular was shite. But Spidey 2 is a very satisfying entry into the comic movie genre. And I've always enjoyed 'the Gift' and 'A Simple Plan' as strong examples of his post-Evil Dead work.

I do wish that he'd get off the Spiderman franchise and do more small budget movies (keeping fingers crossed for his latest). But I don't know that he has had the type of decline that Carpenter and Argento, and the others have.

user-pic

George Lucas and Steven Spielberg.

user-pic

Heh ... Lucas was on the original list but I though he was too obvious a target. For other suggestions, I considered De Palma but he's never had a consistent hot streak. Same with Hooper. Woo has definitely slipped but I don't think as bad as these guts. Gilliam? Raimi? Raimi can be dodgy as a producer but as a director he's only made one bad film in his entire career. Gilliam, by my count has only two duds, one being his solo debut and the other one subjected to major studio interference. Nice call on Nakata, though ... Definitely agree with that one.

user-pic

and i consider the Pang brothers to be in the Masters In Decline category.

user-pic

I'd need to double check stats on this but I was told at one point that Fear And Loathing was the top selling Criterion release of all time. It may have flopped on release but it has aged very well indeed and definitely counts as a commercial success now. And for me it's the Gary Busey cameo that gets me every time ...

The one hit wonder idea is a good one ...

user-pic

Well, the Pang brothers have always been far from being "masters" to begin with.

user-pic

"Woo has definitely slipped but I don’t think as bad as these"

I dunno...he went from Hard Boiled to Broken Arrow, Paycheck and - oh dear - Windtalkers.

user-pic

Wait a minute, how could we all forget Francis Ford Coppola? Great movies: The Conversation, The Godfather I-II, Apocalypse Now. Bad movies: One from the Heart, The Cotton Club, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Youth Without Youth etc.

Agree, Disagree?

user-pic

Hey hokum, I can't really hold it against John Woo for his misfire too much. I chalk it up under the studio people tampering with his artistic integrity as is in most cases with foreign directors entering the Hollywood system. Not all his films in Hollywood is a total loss. Face/Off is a wild joy-ride. John has went from master to decline and then back to master again.

user-pic

Oh and Kathryn Bigelow: Near Dark, Blue Steel, Point Break, Strange Days (I liked it)then... hmmmm? Once the queen of the (male) genre movie she made otherwise bog standard fare into works of art, with a sly wink to macho posturing, embracing it without irony on the surface but simultaneously subverting those conventions. The Hurt Locker has potential but haven't had a chance to see it yet. Judging by how long it's been floating about I'd guess it's been deemed decidedly uncommercial.

user-pic

JAMES, I've heard a lot of good things about THE HURT LOCKER.

user-pic

The Hurt Locker's great. I'd say it's been hung up because it's an Iraq film and those have been commercial death but it's a seriously fantastic film.

TheDoug: Coppola very nearly made the list as well ...

user-pic

Kathryn Bigelow did have a couple of duds (K19 and Weight of Water) but The Hurt Locker is damn good.

user-pic

re: the Pangs

the original Bangkok Dangerous and The Eye are very good films. The Eye, especially, is rather masterful. i mean, it's so influential that so many other films have copied its "style".

OK, so maybe they should be in the One Hit Wonder category.

user-pic

Do dead directors count? Sam Peckinpah - nothing after Cross of Iron in '77.

Also John Landis: Animal House, Blues Brothers, American Werewolf in London, Trading Places all in a row, then downhill.

user-pic

This may be rather heretical, but Ingmar Bergman is an example of the above. He was at his peak in the mid-to-late 60s, but his career went quickly downhill after that. He still managed some fantastic films (Cries and Whispers [1972] and Scenes From a Marriage [1973]), but the bulk of his work in the '70s and early '80s was average at best. His 'last' film, Fanny and Alexander [1982], is one of his most critically acclaimed film; yet, even as a Bergman lover, I have to confess that I disliked it... which means that, for those who take a similar stance on this movie, the last decade of Bergman's career reads pretty bleakly.

user-pic

@ Marshy

I'd classify Ritchie as something akin to an Assembly Line Wunderkind - he'll always have fans and be one of the masters of his element as long as he never leaves the seedy underbelly of London hustlers. It's like a modern long-form serial, like the old Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon teasers.

I felt RockNRolla was thoroughly enjoyable, even though it was an almost color-by-numbers con-man film. But the truth was, Ritchie just opened another door in a world he's been showing us for years now and it felt good to be back.
I mean, Scorsese does it on the American side and I never tire of that either.
Maybe that's MY shortcoming. but hell...if I ever run across Casino, Goodfellas, Lock, or Snatch playing on some channel, I always linger for a while.

user-pic

Peter Bodganovich?
Nickelodeon (1976), Paper Moon (1973) What's Up, Doc? (1972) The Last Picture Show (1971), Mask (1985)

And then??? not much, although I have a soft spot for The Cat's Meow because Eddie Izzard is playing Charlie Chaplin.

user-pic

Didn't Bogdanovich direct a fair amount of The Sopranos? Not film, but solid work.


Related Posts with Thumbnails