Inju

Twitch O Meter

We Love Well-made Monsters!

by Ard Vijn, September 19, 2007 10:27 PM


With D-War finally in US theaters, I was inspired to go with a monster theme for this week's Twitch-O-Meter. But of course I got bogged down within minutes, as I love movie monsters anyway and my list appeared to quickly become a top-100!

Therefore I had to set up some rules, and finally I made it difficult enough for me to make a list small enough for use in this column.
So what is it about? Two rules:

1: The monster needed to bowl me over in the cinema.
2: It needed to baffle or fool me as to how the makers achieved it.

Rule number one makes the other one a bit easier to achieve: you get baffled quicker if you can't hit a replay button. Many special effects look better on the big screen anyway, with your attention focussed on a single detail instead of being able to look at the whole thing. And the reduced color-range and contrast of VHS could change a slight difference in color to a big discrepancy, thereby destroying the realism of the effect. So my list is for cinema-experiences only, where the creature looked real enough to surprise me.

Now up until the CGI craze started I was pretty much a special effects fan, and able to spot them from a mile. I never worked in that field (still haven't) but had a pretty good general knowledge of the subject and knew the bag of tricks concerning optical compositioning, models, matte-paintings, bluescreens and animatronics. Few are the monsters for which I couldn't tell you on first viewing how it was created.

But here are 5 of those few. Monsters that did manage to convince me that either stock footage was inserted which resembled the real thing, or that some sort of full-scale model was built.

Here is my list of monsters that were so well made as to appear (almost) real!


The Walrus

I was twelve when my neighbourhood community center showed "Sinbad & the Eye of the Tiger", several years after its original release. I was a fan already of Ray Harryhausen's work so I was delighted to see this on a reasonably big screen, and I enjoyed myself immensely even though the movie broke 3 times. Monsters, heroes, lost civilisations, Jane Seymour naked... it doesn't get much better when you're twelve!

But the film REALLY made me jump when Sinbad visits an Arctic waste, investigates an odd noise and a Giant Walrus suddenly breaks through the ice! Following that is a typical Ray Harryhausen monster fight, with noticable stop-motion, but for years I thought that the first few shots were filmed using an actual walrus, with the people being the special effect.
Ah, my innocent youth...

The Snake

Less than a year later, a local cinema accidentally switched the rating for "Conan the Barbarian" from "above 16" to "above 12". Curious, me and my 14-year old sister went to see it.
Wow! Decapitation, fornication... and this was the Italian cut where Arnie's tumble with the were-witch lasted a full two minutes longer than the current DVD! My sis gave a concise review for my parents when we got home: "...it was just people killing and fucking, but it was still a good movie!". Needless to say I remember Conan with fondness.

Many years later, the special effects crew of "Anaconda" claimed that their movie was the first one with decent giant snake effects. Hang on, I thought, I recall a pretty good one in Conan!
And indeed Thulsa Doom's pet viper, which Conan encounters when trying to steal jewels from a temple, is a fine example of a movie monster. Like the rest of the movie, the fight looks more gritty and realistic than expected and much blood is used (although it never goes over the top). It was impressive in 1982 and still looks convincing in most shots. To this day I don't know if the beheading was done with an animatronic snake or otherwise.


The Bitch

Ever since secretly reading the comic version in 1980 I was terrified of "Alien", so much so that when I finally saw it on video years later I was both impressed and disappointed. It was nowhere near as scary as I had been telling myself, but still a damn good horror picture.
Fast-forward to 1986, and me willing and able to watch James Cameron's sequel in the cinema. And boy, did it deliver! "Aliens", like the original, is one of my absolute favorites, and may be the most intense time I ever spent in a cinema. I got rid of all my remaining horrorfilm fears in a single afternoon, and at the same time got a nice lesson on how you should do an action movie.

Cameron designed several parts of the sets and weapons himself (using the steady-cam principle to support a heavier gun is a nice touch), but his finest hour came in the finale when the brood-queen of the aliens shows up. Using Giger's brilliant design as a template, Cameron created an ornamented fever-dream version of a giant alien on steroids. Or should that be oestrogens?
When the thing gets mobile the effects get even more impressive: while all the "normal" aliens are stuntmen in suits, their queen couldn't possibly be. And it's here that I had to throw in the towel: I had no clue how they did it. In every shot surrounding the classic line "Get away from her you BITCH!!!", the so-called bitch is a stunning succession of different special effects, as mysteriously fabricated as they are powerful. Incredibly well done, especially when you consider that no CGI was used.
Speaking of which...

The King

Goethe is often (mis)credited for having said: "If the world ends I'll go to the Netherlands, because everything happens 50 years later there". And indeed, while it's not quite THAT bad it certainly felt like it in 1993 when everyone and his mother had already seen "Jurassic Park" and we still had to get it in cinemas.
Rest assured that on premiere day my ass was in the seat, and while slogging through the snooze-inducing first half my mind kept going "T-rex, T-rex, T-rex...". When the creature finally broke through the fence, my jaw dropped on the floor and I suddenly realised we weren't in Kansas anymore, special effects-wise.

By that time decent CGI was very expensive, but there already were some fine examples on display. "The Abyss" and "Terminater 2" come to mind, but both used the new technology to show very abstract creatures, with light bending or reflecting through water and chrome. When I read Spielberg was having a shot to create dinosaurs with this technology I was as incredulous as if he'd tried to clone the real things.
But ILM knocked this assignment straight out of the ballpark: the step forward was so huge that I'm not sure we'll ever see another one quite like it. ILM claimed in 1981 that they could do any effect with 100% realism, given enough money. It was a boast, but in 1993 they proved it was certainly true from then on.


The Host

Now this little film called "The Host" hasn't really been wanting for attention here on this site, so its inclusion in the list might induce a groan or two. But if you've read all of the above it'll come as no surprise to hear me say that I love monsters in movies, and this is such an excellent example why. Korean society as depicted here is indeed a cruel, dumb, corrupt, greedy, pompous and callous monster, and it'll easily kill you if you happen to end up in front of it without any protection.

But never mind all that, there was also an amusing critter in this film and it was far better realised than it had any right to be. More than a decade after Jurassic Park, its special effects can now be delivered on desktop and all that remains necessary is enough time and talent to use these tools.
And use them they did! The "Gwoemul" is a ridiculous creature, cobbled together from parts that do not make any sense (what are those fish doing in its back??), with a dubious origin and strange behavior. Director Bong Joon-Ho just needed some "thing" to lure people into the cinema and show them an ugly mirror, so it's quite an achievement when the end result is as excellent as this one.
Because it really is excellent: the beast is laughable yet scary, and undoubtably one of the best special effects of the past few years. Its much-discussed reveal at the start of the movie, in full daylight no less, is a cherished one rewatched hundreds of times now that I've got it on DVD. It's not purely CGI either: while some shots can only be done using computers, I know they made animatronic parts as well. But it's difficult to tell which are used when, and therefore this one can safely be allowed to close my list.


Did I miss any?
Undoubtably, and I probably missed them in the cinema as well which is a shame. Please mention as many examples as you can come up with in the comments, I'll be very grateful especially if I've never heard of them before!


10 Comments

user-pic

I hope I'm not the only one to admit that the abominable snowman from the animated Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer had me screaming and running for safety to my mother's lap. Seeing that bizarre monster suddenly appear over the mountains was a shock to my five year old mind!

user-pic

I'm no connoisseur of movie monsters, but I was still hoping the Gwoemul would make the list. Bong's movie will go down as a classic in the years to come, due in no small part to the fact that every technical bit of it, including the monster, was done to perfection.

It may not be a precise fit for the list, but the baby in ERASERHEAD immediately leapt to mind. I'm not sure if I want to know how that thing came to be. And it's indeed central to some of the most terrifying moments I've ever seen in film.

user-pic

Thanks for this great article Ardvark! I still haven't gone to see "D-War" yet but am looking forward to it (even though many have said the story is weak).

I'm not sure if these monsters qualify for your criteria but I'd also add the following:

"King Kong" (1933/2005) - No monster list is complete without mentioning Kong. The original is timeless and Peter Jackson's remake is definitely a worthy tribute to the original.

The "Rhedosaurus" from "Beast from 20,000 Fathoms" (1953). Ray Harryhausen's old school stop motion monster is still a wonder even today.

Giant Ants from "Them" (1954) - Another great monster movie from the 50s. While there have been other creepy giant insect movies (Empire of the Ants, Food of the Gods), this is my favorite by far.

"Godzilla" (1954) - The Hondo/Tsuburaya classic that started it all. Absolutely brilliant and still the best Godzilla movie ever.

"The Thing" (1982) - John Carpenter's update of "The Thing from Another World" (1951). One of the most terrifying space monsters (next to the "Alien") to grace the big screen. The SFX effects are still mind blowing even today.

"The Blob" (1988) - The original was somewhat of a joke but this updated "space goo" was definitely impressive. The movie was not that great but the monster was scary.

user-pic

Nicely done, Ard :)

How about An American Werewolf in London? Can't beat that protracted transformation sequence. Even more mind-blowing today, in light of it being 100% practical

I'll second The Thing and the '88 Blob (a friend helped design some of the FX).

user-pic

Loosely tied to this subject, but definately worth a read, is David Mamet on these types of special effects and what not. More specificaly it is Mamet asking "Just How did they do that?"

Mamet - A Guide to Gags

user-pic

John, you'll be happy to know the last one titled "The Host" *is* Gwoemul.

Though I wholeheartedly agree that the creature in the film was very well-done and realistic-looking, I was struck by how many other people thought it was poor-quality animation or "low believability".

In a sign of weakness for one of my favorite movies, Pan from Pan's Labyrinth was another creature that was well-executed, both in form and acting from Doug Jones and the voice (who did the Spanish voice, anyone know? was is Jones himself?)

user-pic

A Few Additions:
Although these are more "effects that transcend effect and become characters":
1. Pumpkinhead
2. Gizmo from Gremlins (esp the Gremlins 2 model)
3. ED-209
4. the Robocop 2 (crap film with amazing finale)

user-pic

Thanks for the comments, and special thanks to Yip-Yop for reminding me that ALL monsters look real when you're 5 years old!

As for King Kong, Godzilla, the Thing, the Blob, etc. I desperately want to do a future TOM just for them.
Truth is, I saw none of these in the cinema, and therefore they were disqualified!

user-pic

He's not a monster, but Johnny 5 from Short Circuit impressed the crap out of me when I was a kid.

What I appreciate most about Gwoemul is the treatment it gets in the movie. Daylight, relatively steady and focused sustained shots, which completely goes against the usual quick-cuts shrouded in darkness.

user-pic

After Jurasic Park the only CGI that impressed me after that was in Starship Troopers. Incredibly realistic in broad dayling. Even today it haven't been topped.

The first giant monster film I remember was Gorgo, I saw it on TV and while I knew it was only an effect I thought it was built full size, with guys hiding in the mouth turning wheels to make it open and shut. It might have something to do with the fact that when I was a kid visiting Italy I went to an amusement park that had the full size 1976 King Kong on display. So naturally I thought that all giant monsters were done that way.

But when I was even younger I didn't know FX existed. I thought Robin Williams really had those arms in Popey and thought Leonard Nemoy really had pointy ears. Ah when one was young and innocent. I'm sure if I could somehow tap in to that mentality I would enjoy movies so much more.


Related Posts with Thumbnails