Venice 2013 Review: MOEBIUS Is Insane and Brilliant

Kim Ki-duk has shocked many a festival/arthouse audience over the years, ever since he used fishhooks to terrible effect in The Isle (2000). Watching his films can be an uncomfortable experience and while he has perhaps gone overboard in the past, he's never been outrageous just for the sake of it. Spectators, for their part, have steadily become more drawn to his works. With his new feature Moebius, never has he so deliberately sought to shock them. His message, framed in a terrifying and morbidly humorous narrative that recalls the tropes and themes of Greek tragedy, is clearer than it's ever been. It's also never been quite this powerful.

A woman catches her husband cheating and in a fit rage brings a knife into his bedroom, slips under the covers and tries to castrate him. He awakes and thwarts her impetuous plot but still wracked with anger she then visits her teenage son's room and dismembers him instead.

The above plays out over mere minutes but to say any more about the events that unfold would only dilute its impact. Safe to say, things only get worse and more bizarre as the film's protagonists are pushed to delirious extremes. It's not exactly a restaging of the Oedipal Complex (though some of its elements are evident) but it does borrow a lot from Greek tragedy, though it's a bit more extreme than what you would find in the Classics.

Kim is known for his mute characters and many of his films feature large tracts of silence. But presenting an entire feature without a single word spoken (though plenty of screaming to fill in that vacuum) has the potential of coming off as a gimmick and consequently disinvesting an attentive audience. Remarkably, even knowing this ahead of time does nothing to detract from the experience. It feels natural and it never draws undue attention to itself. What's more, it makes perfect sense: Moebius is raw and powerful and the absence of dialogue only reinforces its elemental nature.

Though it takes place in and thoroughly castigates Korean society, the insecurities and moral quandaries it depicts, or perhaps the failure of the human race, go far beyond the local sphere. In Kim's film, sexual desire only leads to pain. An act of infidelity results in a terrible consequence that leads to a series of more disastrous outcomes. A father's act leads to his son's castration and his guilt prompts him to seek out ways to give his son the chance to experience sexual pleasure anew. Sex (and the masculine identity it is tied with) supersedes the need for procreation, even if its pursuit is dark and filled with pain.

Sexual violence, particularly as it relates to private 'safe' locations like homes and schools, has long been a trope in Korean film but the last few years have yielded an abundance of difficult narratives that have gone further and been bolder than what has come before. Some have been good (Fatal), and most have been well intentioned but poorly conceived (Azooma, Dirty Blood, Don't Cry Mommy) but all have been literal and unsubtle. Moebius, while as subtle as a hammer to the head, is perhaps the most effective of these recent exhumations of some very dark aspects of Korean society. Those that have remained buried under Park Chung-hee's economic miracle of the 1970s, the consumerist gloss of modern day Seoul and everything in between. Filled with rage and confusion, the characters in Kim's world amble about imperiously, unable to do anything but hurt one another. It's a grim experience but one that isn't too self-serious.

Each member of Kim's small cast is called on to enact some rather shocking events and what's more without the use of dialogue. Cho Jae-hyun is no stranger to this kind of role, having already starred in some early Kim films, not to mention other subdued roles in last year's The Weight and El Condor Pasa. He's in his element here as Kim seems to know exactly what to do with him, rarely has he been better. Lee Eun-woo makes a big impression in her first significant appearance as she takes on the parts of both the wife and the mistress (which itself adds a number of insidious levels to the relationships within the film). But the real revelation here is Seo Joung-joo, the 15-year-old actor who made big waves in last year's Juvenile Offender. His brave performance here singles him out as a major talent to watch.

Make no mistake about it, Moebius is an extremely difficult film that is destined to be hated (even reviled) by many. Yet for each that detests it, others will be taken in by its sheer force. I have often been turned off by Kim's films (I wasn't terribly keen on last year's Pieta) but here, the controversial auteur has achieved something that is nothing short of remarkable: a balance between the themes he wishes to underscore, his extreme tendencies, his own dark side and the mechanics of effective storytelling. It doesn't hurt that Kim's direction finds ample humor in the macabre. A wild and courageous work from Korea's enfant terrible, Moebius is one of the most powerful experiences of the year.

rsz_12013_-_moebisu_still_2.jpg

Around the Internet:
  • sitenoise

    I enjoyed AMEN quite a bit more than PIETA, even though it's clearly a 'lesser' film, probably because it lacked any dialog. As a thought experiment, imagine PIETA without any dialog. All of the "hey! it's visual poetry" kudos for it wouldn't be spoiled by the explicit "You're not my mom/okay, I love you mom/I'll die for you, mom" story arc silliness of the exposition he made us confront. I don't think dialog is Kim's strong suit, and when he includes it, imo, it's either sort of ridiculous (script-wise) or at odds with the poetic nature of his visual story telling, not to mention the emotional depths he likes to play in. As an addendum to this point I'll mention I hated SPRING, SUMMER ... (as beautiful as it is) precisely because the words in it were so banal that it made the whole film a giant eye-roller for me.

    Needless to say, I'm looking forward to MOEBIUS.

  • wangkon936

    Kim Ki-duk is weird, even by Korean standards.

  • Mark Savage

    I loved PIETA (which he didn't actually direct) a lot, and am a huge fan of THE ISLE, CROCODILE, BIRDCAGE INN, ADDRESS UNKNOWN, and BAD GUY. This sounds fascinating.

    I liked his recent autobiographical film, too: ARIRANG.

  • Pierce Conran

    Great picks but how do you mean he didn't direct PIETA?

  • I felt the emotions in Pieta so I can't wait for this one

  • Aleks

    Good to hear that the reviewer also disliked Pieta, gives me a bit more confidence in this review and the film. It's too bad that Kim Ki-Duk has become so fixated on sex and violence, because of it he has forgotten to infuse heart and integrity into his latest few films.

  • Pierce Conran

    Funny that you mention that, as previously, my favorites of his were SPRING, SUMMER... and 3-IRON, generally considered among his lighter fare.

    That said, while his outlook has always been dark, it feels to me like he's only becoming more honest about what he sees, or more specifically, how he feels about Korea. I've lived here for a spell now and though I still believe that I'm very much on the outside looking in, Kim's dark streak is beginning to feel like less and less of an exaggeration.

  • Aleks

    Coicidentally those two films are my favorites of his too.

    I guess I never considered the bleakness in his films being grounded in reality or at least his perception of it. Except for the literal stuff maybe, like the depressing insurance schtick from Pieta, which was obviously taken straight from life and onto the screen. But what is it exactly that you've witnessed or felt in Korea that compels Kim to insert into his films?

  • Pierce Conran

    Without going into too much detail, Kim has gone to great lengths to deconstruct the facade of modern Korea in his films.

  • Art Vandelay

    KIM Ki-Duk Is Insane and Brilliant. =)

    To be honest, this feels like a greatest hits compilation of Kim Ki-Duk's work.

blog comments powered by Disqus
​​