The Last Time I Saw ALIEN: RESURRECTION

James Marsh, Asian Editor
In preparation for Ridley Scott's upcoming Prometheus, I, like the rest of the science-fiction-loving world, judiciously put aside eight hours of my weekend to re-watch the four previous installments of the Alien franchise (no AVP nonsense here). This exercise confirmed a number of my pre-existing feelings about the quadrilogy: that Alien is the most beautifully crafted film of the series, not to mention one of the best sci-fi horror films ever made, while James Cameron's Aliens remains the most entertaining and my personal favourite. However, watching the four films back-to-back for the first time also revealed to me just how weak David Fincher's Alien 3 really is - how it lacks structure, characterisation, the strength to bring something new to the saga beyond a dog and a set of shears - and as a result, what an impressive job Alien: Resurrection does in putting the series back on track, while advancing it in the most daring and audacious ways yet.

I first saw Alien: Resurrection back in 1997, when it originally hit cinemas and I was a precocious and opinionated film student in the North West of England. My date and I ventured to the recently refurbished Arndale Centre in Manchester, for what proceeded to be an awkward, gooey and ultimately underwhelming encounter. But enough about the date.  My initial impression of Alien: Resurrection was one of disappointment. I had long been a fan of both the series and French director Jean-Pierre Jeunet (Delicatessen, The City of Lost Children) and was anticipating this collaboration with some relish. What I witnessed that day was an uneven collision of poorly judged body horror and broad slapstick comedy that seemed completely at odds with the Alien series I knew and loved. Ripley appeared to be lampooning Snake Plissken rather than advancing her own character, while the addition of Winona Ryder (who had long before lost her Heathers-era charm) only further fuelled my ire. The rest of the performances seemed caricatured and lazy, the action lacked tension or excitement, and the film's spectacularly ridiculous finale was not only misjudged but took the alien itself to a place I was vehemently unwilling to embrace. In short, I disliked the film pretty strongly and shelved it, along with my opinions, until now.

If I'm honest I think I have revisited Alien: Resurrection once or twice in the 15 years that followed, both on VHS and DVD when the inevitable boxset purchases were made, but if I did sit through the whole thing again, it was with such a degree of disconnect and disdain that the film frankly never stood a chance of being fairly re-evaluated. Last Sunday, however, I rallied together a group of likeminded individuals for a daylong pre-Prometheus cramming session, barely pausing for toilet breaks between each film. In doing so, I was able to fully appreciate the experience of Alien: Resurrection, not only as an individual endeavour by Jeunet, scriptwriter Joss Whedon and their collected collaborators, but also as an ambitious attempt to reboot a franchise that had fallen from the upper echelons of genre classic status to the messy netherworlds of franchise fatigue. Alien 3 had killed off its heroine just as the series was beginning to investigate Ripley's relationship with the alien beyond them being simply enemies, but rather becoming some kind of mismatched partners in crime. Strike that, they're a family now.


Faced with the challenge of bringing Ripley back to life, Whedon headed for the only logical solution, and has her cloned by the military. Exactly where they got a sample of her DNA from is not revealed - we can assume there wasn't much left of her in all that molten lead - but we can accept the possibility that Clemens (Charles Dance) may have taken a blood sample after she was rescued at the opening of the previous film. It is, after all, far from the biggest hurdle we are to be presented with. A secret military operation on board the USM Auriga has successfully cloned Ripley, but not primarily to bring her back to life 200 years after her suicide, but to extract the Alien queen embryo that was gestating inside her. Where the script really triumphs is by introducing the idea that there was no clean break between guest and host. Ripley is alive, but with trace elements of alien now in her DNA, and as the film goes on to reveal, the alien queen has received a little something in return - namely a massive, external human reproductive system.

Ripley must come to terms, not only with being brought back to life into yet another future world environment that is not her own, but also with the fact that she is no longer herself. The alien has won. It has a hold on her, at a molecular level, from which she can never hope to escape. Whedon ensures that Ripley has some fun with her predicament - giving her superhuman strength and dexterity, not to mention acid for blood and an uncanny sixth sense that can "feel" the other aliens. He even forces her to confront a roomful of less successful incarnations of herself, each displaying her new hideous cross-species identity in more monstrous, crippling detail. The film also makes Ripley deal with this new development in her relationship with the alien on a profoundly human level. Her foe is also her child now, her own flesh and blood, and in the film's grand finale this tangled relationship becomes even more complex, as Ripley and the queen consummate their 18-year courtship with the birth of their own incestuous offspring. By producing a monster of her own, she has become both the enemy and its protector.

But it's not all about Ripley in Alien: Resurrection. Whedon's script introduces a rich array of diverse characters, from soldiers and scientists to androids and space pirates, and Jeunet brings on board a host of impressive character actors to give them life. The film boasts delightfully full blown turns from Ron Perlman, Michael Wincott, Brad Douriff and Dominique Pinon, all of which are far broader than anything you will see in Ridley Scott's original, and more vivacious than the interchangeable shaven headed souls lost in Fincher's anonymous Alien 3. We must look to the hot-headed, wise-cracking ensemble of Cameron's Aliens to find such a diverse and extroverted collection of characters, and Whedon's smart dialogue coupled with Jeunet's larger-than-life aesthetic proves a successful formula for creating people that an audience can recognise, relate to and ultimately, care about.


Even the aliens themselves are given more personality in Alien: Resurrection than we have witnessed in the past. Since the very beginning, the various crews have been warned of the creature's intelligence, but we have really only witnessed its hostility. Sure, in Cameron's film the queen grasps the concept of an elevator pretty quickly, while her minions see the benefits of short-circuiting the electrical mains - "How can they cut the power? They're animals!" - but never before have we really seen the aliens learn, or work together to this extent. Remember, in the interim between Alien 3 in 1992 and Alien: Resurrection in late 1997 we saw not one but two Jurassic Park movies, chock-full of those "clever girls", the velociraptors. The aliens in Jeunet's movie bear more than a passing resemblance to Spielberg's intuitive reptiles, and the way they work as a pack to escape their cells and hunt down their captors was a real step forward for the creatures' onscreen development.

As a final, parting note of appreciation for the much maligned Alien: Resurrection, it should be acknowledged that Jeunet and Whedon brought Ripley home. The film ends with our heroine gazing out of the window at clouds, oceans and terra firma - and yet filled with a greater sense of trepidation and dread than ever before. She acknowledges back in Alien 3 that she has been confined to the depths of space, incessantly pursued by murderous xenomorphs for so long that she no longer knows of anything else. She has no place on this Earth - no family, no home - and yet, this is where her journey must eventually end. It is a tantalising denouement, which obviously leaves the door wide open for further adventures for both Ripley and the alien - but ones that may very well prove too expensive to actually bring to the screen any time soon. While for some, the narrative closure at the end of Alien 3 gave the series a greater sense of finality, it was also somewhat defeatist and unsatisfying. Ripley lost. She gained her freedom, but only at the expense of her own life. Didn't she deserve more? As Alien: Resurrection ends, and Call asks, "So, what now?" Ripley must concede that for the first time in centuries she does not know. Even death cannot free her from the alien, and more importantly, cannot free the franchise from the commercial whims of its owners. While Ridley Scott is proving right now that there is a hunger for this universe that extends beyond the exploits of Lt. Ellen Ripley, the tantalising prospect of her coming home, and bringing at least a trace element of the species with her, has me confident that one day her story will be resurrected once again.

Around the Internet:
  • Mr. Cavin

    Ah. I never do this. I would never run right out and watch a series of other, connected movies before launching an experience with a brand new thing. I can't see that would do anything but confuse my expectations. Ergo, when I saw ALIEN: RESURRECTION, I didn't worry overly about its continuation of a series that, by that point, I'd already assumed really just enjoyed its greatest merit as a infrastructure for visionary directors. If I did have any geekly reaction to the particulars of overarching plot integrity, coming up in an Alien-infested multiplex, I got that out of my system after enjoying Cameron's movie. From then on I was just really enthusiastic to see what the next artistic mind might do with the premise. ALIEN JE T'AIME, as it were.

    So I walked into this movie, that first time, very interested--and I walked out satisfied. It was so neat, so weird, and had a particularly European sensibility that no other entry had. I liked the crazy grotesquerie, and the gizmo whimsey, and the crotchety satire of corporation and futurism. This movie did not take itself too seriously. But it did take guts, and it certainly had elan. Maybe it was a little scatterbrained, or a little too enthusiastic about toying with conventions of sci-horror and the norms of American bravura, but the movie achieved a look and a feel that was all its own, and I'm not sure I've ever been able to say that about any other entry so ostensibly deep within a beloved franchise.

    So thanks for this review. It's kind of a relief. I've come up a little frustrated with all the unthoughtful dismissal this movie has garnered over the years (I don't mean those who can back up their disliking it with reasons--that's perfectly fine with me), and I admit I was a little worried when it became obvious Twitch had an article on the horizon.

    Side note: Watching ALIEN: RESURRECTION again a few years ago--probably when the "Quadrilogy" came out--I was struck by the fact that it features a proto version of the Serenity crew from Whedon's FIREFLY. Here's the dashing maverick space pirate captain, his serious and physical number two, the hulking mercenary, the cute science girl, the strange mechanic--all manning an illegal ship working the fringes of society. I mean, it's not exactly a one-to-one correlation, nor is it a particularly inventive scenario, but it is obviously something that was already cooking in Joss' crucible, and it's fun to watch the eventual show and imagine the Serenity cast with the crew of the Betty instead.

  • Sean "The Butcher" Smithson

    "Side note: Watching ALIEN: RESURRECTION again a few years ago--probably when the "Quadrilogy" came out--I was struck by the fact that it features a proto version of the Serenity crew from Whedon's FIREFLY. Here's the dashing maverick space pirate captain, his serious and physical number two, the hulking mercenary, the cute science girl, the strange mechanic--all manning an illegal ship working the fringes of society."

    It also struck me as very CRUSHER JOE, and was straight out of a zillion sci-fi novels.

  • Mr. Cavin



    "...nor is it a particularly inventive scenario..."

    I take your meaning, of course, but I was talking about this as being a key to Whedon's creative trajectory, not as some shining example of his uniqueness. That would be absurd, anyway, since the whole thrust of that man's career is these interesting ways he interprets established genre conventions.

  • James Marsh

    Wow, if only my article had as much insight and eloquence as your article - many thanks for sharing your thoughts and for supporting what I do now believe to be a truly and unfairly maligned film. Had you asked me a week ago I would have sniffed and dismissed the film for all the reasons those above you have done so. Perhaps because I went into it with such incredibly low expectations that I got so much from it this time round.

  • Mr. Cavin

    Oh please. Your review was insight and eloquence from beginning to end. But thanks for the kind words!

    And for perspective, here is an incredibly abbreviated list of beloved genre movies I disliked the first time around, but which did eventually win me over: BEETLEJUICE, HELLRAISER, ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK, BRAZIL,* and AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON. And I couldn't possibly begin to list off all the movies in which my opinion traveled the other way. I like to consider myself pretty flexible. There is a lot to be said for a viewer's mood, expectation, or even his movie-going mileage. This idea we have that we really need to stick with our hasty first impressions--that we need to defend them tooth and nail as if they were somehow objectively concrete--is ultimately a pretty stultifying intellectual exercise.

    * it's complicated.

  • Did you see the TV cut of Brazil first? I did and it was a confusing experience. But it was enough to get me to seek out the real thing and Brazil has had a bigger impact on me than any other film ever made as a result ...

  • Mr. Cavin

    Naw, it was the US theatrical cut. The problem here was that I just wasn't ready for it. Getting a headfull of Terry Gilliam was a lot like discovering that there was a strong new flavor between salty and bitter. It was intriguing and uncomfortable and took a little getting used to. I was fourteen. I was a fan of the cuddlier TIME BANDITS already, but that film manages to mitigate the full effect of Gilliam's--I don't know how to put it-- wicked delight in pessimism? I'm not sure I was aware that a positive experience could be so anxious, and I felt more disturbed by the enormity of the movie--was really troubled by the bleakness--by the time I left the theater. I knew it was good and all, but I didn't ever want to see it again.

    Of course, six weeks later I saw it again anyway, and I laughed all the way through it. It was hilarious! How did I miss that the first time around? I was impressed that a movie could be so many kinda opposite things, and that was when BRAZIL began to define for me what I meant when I said a movie was "great".

  • Kurt Halfyard

    Whoa. I kind of love these two paragraphs on that film. Thanks, Cavin for being so lovingly articulate!

    Brazil is baffling and awesome, and is indeed hard to not keeping coming back to!

  • mightyjoeyoung

    "However, watching the four films back-to-back for the first time also revealed to me just how weak David Fincher's Alien 3 really is - how it lacks structure, characterisation, the strength to bring something new to the saga beyond a dog and a set of shears"

    Did you see the Uncut version...?

    I always felt that A3 was better in uncut version and the theatrical cut is totally erratic, flawed, and makes very little sense.

    Some of stuff mention in this text about A4, I agree upon.....

    I like all 4 of them....haven´t seen Promethus yet......

  • James Marsh

    I'm not sure that I have seen the extended version of ALIEN 3 - at least certainly not recently. Perhaps I should give it a go.

  • mightyjoeyoung

    Yeah...do so....A3 is better uncut.

  • Joshua Chaplinsky

    First time I saw Alien Ress was the last. I checked out as soon as Ripley and the Alien made sweet, sweet love. Horrendous.

  • Kurt Halfyard

    As I have not taste for the AvP movies, I consider Alien Resurrection to by my 'Lark' of the franchise. It's goofy comic-book stuff with zero weight, consequence or even interest. It's a side-show freak show with about as much lasting value, but it is charmingly grotesque in its emptiness. That gets it a minimum of points.

    I still consider the Alien Franchise more or less a Trilogy. Prometheus and Resurrection are 'bonus' entries but outside the nice, clean neat triptych of Scott-Cameron-Fincher.

    (Of course I say this having not seen Prometheus yet...)

  • SonaBoy

    Sorry - AlienRes did nothing for me. Ripley 8 barely even cared for anything aside from her own survival, she tolerated Winona's mewing, screechy android (for some reason), but other than that, why should Ripley care ANYTHING about Earth? You can disagree with how Alien3 was off-putting, but AlienR simply made NO sense to me at all.

    I understand Whedon had a first script that was much different, but it still hinged on how a ragtag bunch of thieves and terrorists and a predatorial human hybrid all band together in the 11th hour to "save Earth."

    Why?

    Why does anyone in that band of scumbags on the lam feel like going to, and saving Earth? One of them even straight up called Earth a shithole. It's probably the studio at work, but barely any of the character motivations made any sense, even within their own world.

    Taking a bit from Aliens, who the hell on Earth would be glad to see Ripley? She just destroyed a SECOND starship and now owes 2 companies, oh...80 billion dollars in assets. At least Alien3 had the balls to be nihilistic about society, humanity and man's future. Ripley in A3 didn't kill herself to save humanity - she killed herself simply to deny Weyland the beast inside her, since they twice tricked her into going after it. That's about as rational a motivation as one could have, really.

  • zwortnik

    I still hate it, though I've had a similar change of heart regarding 3 (at least the director's cut, I haven't bothered to sit through the theatrical version I hated so much in the '90s).

blog comments powered by Disqus
​​